The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salting-Out Effect in Aqueous NaCl Solutions: Trends with Size and Polarity of Solute Molecules
Abstract
Salting-out in aqueous NaCl solutions is relevant for the environmental behavior of organic contaminants. In this study, Setschenow (or salting-out) coefficients (K(s) [M(-1)]) for 43 diverse neutral compounds in NaCl solutions were measured using a shared headspace passive dosing method and a negligible depletion solid phase microextraction technique. The results were used to calibrate and evaluate estimation models for K(s). The molar volume of the solute correlated only moderately with K(s) (R(2) = 0.49, SD = 0.052). The polyparameter linear free energy relationship (pp-LFER) model that uses five compound descriptors resulted in a more accurate fit to our data (R(2) = 0.83, SD = 0.031). The pp-LFER analysis revealed that Na(+) and Cl(-) in aqueous solutions increase the cavity formation energy cost and the polar interaction energies toward neutral organic solutes. Accordingly, the salting-out effect increases with the size and decreases with the polarity of the solute molecule. COSMO-RS, a quantum mechanics-based fully predictive model, generally overpredicted the experimental K(s), but the predicted values were moderately correlated with the experimental values (R(2) = 0.66, SD = 0.042). Literature data (n = 93) were predicted by the calibrated pp-LFER and COSMO-RS models with root mean squared errors of 0.047 and 0.050, respectively. This study offers prediction models to estimate K(s), allowing implementation of the salting-out effect in contaminant fate models, linkage of various partition coefficients (such as air-water, sediment-water, and extraction phase-water partition coefficients) measured for fresh water and seawater, and estimation of enhancement of extraction efficiency in analytical procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Cited by
Applications of Polyparameter Linear Free Energy Relationships in Environmental Chemistry
Endo, S., & Goss, K.-U. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es503369t · Cited by 302
Self-citationCai, W., Navarro, D. A., Du, J., Ying, G., Yang, B., McLaughlin, M. J., & Kookana, R. S. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152975 · Cited by 259
Desorption kinetics of hydrophobic organic contaminants from marine plastic pellets
Endo, S., Yuyama, M., & Takada, H. (2013) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.018 · Cited by 167
Self-citationLithium extraction from complex aqueous solutions using supported ionic liquid membranes
Zante, G., Boltoeva, M., Masmoudi, A., Barillon, R., & Trébouet, D. (2019) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.013 · Cited by 142
Langberg, H. A., Breedveld, G. D., Grønning, H. M., Kvennås, M., Jenssen, B. M., & Hale, S. E. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00927 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Endo, S., Pfennigsdorff, A., & Goss, K.-U.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-01-17
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1496-1503
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2040231786
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.