Cited by 131Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Bioaccumulation of fluorotelomer sulfonates and perfluoroalkyl acids in marine organisms living in aqueous film-forming foam impacted waters

Open access
Langberg, Håkon A., Breedveld, Gijs D., Grønning, Hege M., Kvennås, Marianne, Jenssen, Bjørn M., Hale, Sarah E.·2019·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The use of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) has resulted in hot spots polluted with poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs). The phase out of long-chained perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) from AFFFs resulted in the necessity for alternatives, and short-chained PFAAs and fluorotelomer-based surfactants have been used. Here, the distribution of PFAS contamination in the marine environment surrounding a military site in Norway was investigated. Up to 30 PFASs were analyzed in storm, leachate, and fjord water; marine sediments; marine invertebrates (snails, green shore crab, great spider crab, and edible crab); and teleost fish (Atlantic cod, European place, and Lemon sole). Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) was the most abundantly detected PFAS. Differences in PFAS accumulation levels were observed among species, likely reflecting different exposure routes among trophic levels and different capabilities for depuration and/or enzymatic degradation. In agreement with previous literature, almost no 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTS) was detected in teleost fish. However, this study is one of the first to report considerable concentrations of 6:2 FTS in marine invertebrates, suggesting bioaccumulation. Biota monitoring and risk assessments of sites contaminated with fluorotelomer sulfonates (FTSs) and related compounds should not be limited to fish, but should also include invertebrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.9b00927

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langberg, H. A., Breedveld, G. D., Grønning, H. M., Kvennås, M., Jenssen, B. M., & Hale, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Langberg, Håkon A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2019-07-28
Volume
53
Issue
18
Pages
10951-10960
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2966361619
Cited by
131
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Norges Forskningsråd (268258/E50)
  • Forsvarsbygg (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
fluorotelomer sulfonates, perfluoroalkyl acids, aqueous film-forming foam, PFAS contamination, bioaccumulation, marine invertebrates, marine fish, PFOS, 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate, marine sediment, leachate, military installations, trophic levels, depuration
MeSH terms
Alkanesulfonates, Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Norway, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Aquatic Organisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review