The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uranium(VI) Reduction by Iron(II) Monosulfide Mackinawite
Abstract
Reaction of aqueous uranium(VI) with iron(II) monosulfide mackinawite in an O(2) and CO(2) free model system was studied by batch uptake measurements, equilibrium modeling, and L(III) edge U X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Batch uptake measurements showed that U(VI) removal was almost complete over the wide pH range between 5 and 11 at the initial U(VI) concentration of 5 × 10(-5) M. Extraction by a carbonate/bicarbonate solution indicated that most of the U(VI) removed from solution was reduced to nonextractable U(IV). Equilibrium modeling using Visual MINTEQ suggested that U was in equilibrium with uraninite under the experimental conditions. X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy showed that the U(IV) phase associated with mackinawite was uraninite. Oxidation experiments with dissolved O(2) were performed by injecting air into the sealed reaction bottles containing mackinawite samples reacted with U(VI). Dissolved U measurement and XAS confirmed that the uraninite formed from the U(VI) reduction by mackinawite did not oxidize or dissolve under the experimental conditions. This study shows that redox reactions between U(VI) and mackinawite may occur to a significant extent, implying an important role of the ferrous sulfide mineral in the redox cycling of U under sulfate reducing conditions. This study also shows that the presence of mackinawite protects uraninite from oxidation by dissolved O(2). The findings of this study suggest that uraninite formation by abiotic reduction by the iron sulfide mineral under low temperature conditions is an important process in the redistribution and sequestration of U in the subsurface environments at U contaminated sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fe(II) Redox Chemistry in the Environment
Huang, J., Jones, A., Waite, T. D., Chen, Y., Huang, X., Rosso, K. M., Kappler, A., Mansor, M., Tratnyek, P. G., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01286 · Cited by 620
Zhang, H., Liu, W., Li, A., Zhang, D., Li, X., Zhai, F., Chen, L., Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Wang, S. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201909718 · Cited by 485
The biogeochemistry and bioremediation of uranium and other priority radionuclides
Newsome, L., Morris, K., & Lloyd, J. R. (2014) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.10.034 · Cited by 476
Cheng, D., Yuan, S., Liao, P., & Zhang, P. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b02833 · Cited by 263
Uranium isotopes fingerprint biotic reduction
Stylo, M., Neubert, N., Wang, Y., Monga, N., Romaniello, S. J., Weyer, S., & Bernier-Latmani, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421841112 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyun, S. P., Davis, J. A., Sun, K., & Hayes, K. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-29
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3369-3376
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2313040401
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.