Cited by 166Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisRadioactive element chemistry and processing

Uranium isotopes fingerprint biotic reduction

Open access
Stylo, Malgorzata, Neubert, Nadja, Wang, Yuheng, Monga, Nikhil, Romaniello, Stephen J., Weyer, Stefan, Bernier-Latmani, Rizlan·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Knowledge of paleo-redox conditions in the Earth's history provides a window into events that shaped the evolution of life on our planet. The role of microbial activity in paleo-redox processes remains unexplored due to the inability to discriminate biotic from abiotic redox transformations in the rock record. The ability to deconvolute these two processes would provide a means to identify environmental niches in which microbial activity was prevalent at a specific time in paleo-history and to correlate specific biogeochemical events with the corresponding microbial metabolism. Here, we demonstrate that the isotopic signature associated with microbial reduction of hexavalent uranium (U), i.e., the accumulation of the heavy isotope in the U(IV) phase, is readily distinguishable from that generated by abiotic uranium reduction in laboratory experiments. Thus, isotope signatures preserved in the geologic record through the reductive precipitation of uranium may provide the sought-after tool to probe for biotic processes. Because uranium is a common element in the Earth's crust and a wide variety of metabolic groups of microorganisms catalyze the biological reduction of U(VI), this tool is applicable to a multiplicity of geological epochs and terrestrial environments. The findings of this study indicate that biological activity contributed to the formation of many authigenic U deposits, including sandstone U deposits of various ages, as well as modern, Cretaceous, and Archean black shales. Additionally, engineered bioremediation activities also exhibit a biotic signature, suggesting that, although multiple pathways may be involved in the reduction, direct enzymatic reduction contributes substantially to the immobilization of uranium.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1421841112

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dissolution process itself causes no U isotope fractionation, but subsequent U(IV) incorporation into secondary calcite phases does cause U isotope fractionation, as may calcite recrystallization under pore water conditions distinct from seawater.

    “The dissolution process itself causes no U isotope fractionation (32), but the subsequent U(IV) incorporation into secondary and more stable calcite phases does cause U isotope fractionation (35), as may calcite recrystallization under pore water conditions distinct from seawater (36).”

    From Atmosphere-ocean oxygen and productivity dynamics during early animal radiations (2019) · cites this paper as [35]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • U isotopes can potentially track biotic reduction of U(VI), providing a potential novel redox biosignature proxy in the rock record.

    “More recent work has also demonstrated that U isotopes can potentially be used to track the biotic reduction of U(VI), providing the potential for a novel redox biosignature proxy in the rock record (Stylo et al., 2015).”

    From Trace elements at the intersection of marine biological and geochemical evolution (2016) · cites this paper as Stylo et al., 2015

  • This utility has profound effects for the evolution of the biosphere and perhaps for tracking the biotic signature of U reduction in the rock record.

    “This, in turn, has profound effects for the evolution of the biosphere, and perhaps even for tracking the biotic signature of U reduction in the rock record (Stylo et al., 2015).”

    From Trace elements at the intersection of marine biological and geochemical evolution (2016) · cites this paper as Stylo et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gorby YA, Lovley DR (1992) Enzymatic uranium precipitation. Environ Sci Technol 26(1):205-207.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stylo, M., Neubert, N., Wang, Y., Monga, N., Romaniello, S. J., Weyer, S., & Bernier-Latmani, R.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-04-20
Volume
112
Issue
18
Pages
5619-5624
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2151544845
Cited by
166
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 5
FWCI
12.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (200020-144335)
  • National Science Foundation (OCE-0952394)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
Keywords
uranium isotopes, paleoredox conditions, microbial metabolism, uranium(VI), black shales, bioremediation
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Ecology, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Oxidation-Reduction, Paleontology, Uranium, Reproducibility of Results, Geologic Sediments, Shewanella, Geological Phenomena, X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review