Response to comment on screening for PBT chemicals among the “Existing” and “New” chemicals of the EU
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCorrespondence/Rebut...Correspondence/RebuttalNEXTResponse to Comment on Screening for PBT Chemicals among the "Existing" and "New" Chemicals of the EUMartin Scheringer*, Sebastian Strempel, Carla A. Ng, and Konrad HungerbühlerView Author Information Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland*Phone: +41-44-632 30 62; e-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 11, 6065–6066Publication Date (Web):May 1, 2013Publication History Published online13 May 2013Published inissue 4 June 2013https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es401769zhttps://doi.org/10.1021/es401769zarticle-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2013 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views562Altmetric-Citations3LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (161 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Acyls,Anions,Aromatic compounds,Chemical structure,Cytosine Get e-Alerts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluorinated alternatives are similarly resistant to ultimate degradation (i.e., persistent) in the environment as long-chain PFASs.
“Nevertheless, we do know that these replacements will be similarly resistant to ultimate degradation, i.e. persistent, in the environment as long-chain PFASs (Scheringer et al., 2013;Strempel et al., 2012).”
From Helsingør Statement on poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) (2014) · cites this paper as Scheringer et al., 2013
Cites
Gupta, R. R., Kumar, M., & Gupta, V. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-72276-9 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Screening for PBT Chemicals among the “Existing” and “New” Chemicals of the EU
Strempel, S., Scheringer, M., Ng, C. A., & Hungerbühler, K. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3002713 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationAn ab initio study on nucleic acid bases aromaticities
Cysewski, P. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM · doi:10.1016/j.theochem.2004.10.030 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Pérez‐Manríquez, L., Cabrera, A., Sansores, L. E., et al. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-010-0825-2 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The topology and the aromaticity of coumarins
Ilić, P., Mohar, B., Knop, J. V., et al. (1982) · Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jhet.5570190334 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Comment on Screening for PBT Chemicals among the “Existing” and “New” Chemicals of the EU
Rayne, S. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es401204q · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Scheringer, M., Strempel, S., Ng, C. A., & Hungerbühler, K.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Scheringer, Martin
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6065-6066
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2332159534
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2014: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Keywords
- persistent bioaccumulative toxic chemicals, existing chemicals, new chemicals, chemical safety assessment
- MeSH terms
- Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, European Union, Hazardous Substances
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
