The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phosphate Separation and Recovery from Wastewater by Novel Electrodialysis
Abstract
Stimulated by the depletion of phosphate resources, phosphate recovery systems have been studied in recent years. The use of struvite reactors has proven to be an effective phosphate recovery process. However, the struvite reactor effluent still consists of an excessive amount of phosphate that cannot be recovered nor can be directly discharged. In this study, selectrodialysis (SED) was used to improve the efficiency of phosphate recovery from a struvite reactor: SED was implemented in such a way that phosphate from the effluent of an USAB (upflow anaerobic sludge blanket) reactor was transferred to the recycled effluent of a struvite reactor. Prior to the experiments, synthetic water with chloride and phosphate was used to characterize the efficiency of SED for phosphate separation. Results indicate that SED was successful in concentrating phosphate from the feed stream. The initial current efficiency reached 72%, with a satisfying (9 mmol L(-1)) phosphate concentration. In the experiments with the anaerobic effluent as the phosphate source for enrichment of the effluent of the struvite reactor, the phosphate flux was 16 mmol m(-2) h(-1). A cost evaluation shows that 1 kWh electricity can produce 60 g of phosphate by using a full scale stack, with a desalination rate of 95% on the feed wastewater. Finally, a struvite precipitation experiment shows that 93% of phosphate can be recovered. Thus, an integrated SED-struvite reactor process can be used to improve phosphate recovery from wastewater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhang, Y., Paepen, S., Pinoy, L., Meesschaert, B., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2012) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.12.017 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Cited by
Electrodialysis desalination for water and wastewater: A review
Al-Amshawee, S., Yunus, M. Y. B. M., Azoddein, A. A. M., Hassell, D. G., Dakhil, I. H., & Hasan, H. A. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122231 · Cited by 964
Campione, A., Gurreri, L., Ciofalo, M., Micale, G., Tamburini, A., & Cipollina, A. (2018) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.12.044 · Cited by 588
Xie, M., Shon, H. K., Gray, S. R., & Elimelech, M. (2016) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.045 · Cited by 580
Gurreri, L., Tamburini, A., Cipollina, A., & Micale, G. (2020) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes10070146 · Cited by 492
Reig, M., Vecino, X., Valderrama, C., Gibert, O., & Cortina, J. L. (2018) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.040 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Desmidt, E., Van Looveren, A., Pinoy, L., Meesschaert, B., & Van der Bruggen, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-05-20
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5888-5895
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2326323908
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphate Separation and Recovery from Wastewater by Novel Electrodialysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es4004476
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., Desmidt, E., Van Looveren, A., Pinoy, L., Meesschaert, B., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2013). Phosphate Separation and Recovery from Wastewater by Novel Electrodialysis. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4004476
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.