The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High-Throughput Models for Exposure-Based Chemical Prioritization in the ExpoCast Project
Abstract
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) must characterize potential risks to human health and the environment associated with manufacture and use of thousands of chemicals. High-throughput screening (HTS) for biological activity allows the ToxCast research program to prioritize chemical inventories for potential hazard. Similar capabilities for estimating exposure potential would support rapid risk-based prioritization for chemicals with limited information; here, we propose a framework for high-throughput exposure assessment. To demonstrate application, an analysis was conducted that predicts human exposure potential for chemicals and estimates uncertainty in these predictions by comparison to biomonitoring data. We evaluated 1936 chemicals using far-field mass balance human exposure models (USEtox and RAIDAR) and an indicator for indoor and/or consumer use. These predictions were compared to exposures inferred by Bayesian analysis from urine concentrations for 82 chemicals reported in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Joint regression on all factors provided a calibrated consensus prediction, the variance of which serves as an empirical determination of uncertainty for prioritization on absolute exposure potential. Information on use was found to be most predictive; generally, chemicals above the limit of detection in NHANES had consumer/indoor use. Coupled with hazard HTS, exposure HTS can place risk earlier in decision processes. High-priority chemicals become targets for further data collection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology
Richard, A. M., Judson, R. S., Houck, K. A., Grulke, C. M., Volarath, P., Thillainadarajah, I., Yang, C., Rathman, J., Martin, M. T., Wambaugh, J. F., et al. (2016) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00135 · Cited by 709
Self-citationTollefsen, K. E., Scholz, S., Cronin, M. T., Edwards, S. W., de Knecht, J., Crofton, K., Garcia-Reyero, N., Hartung, T., Worth, A., & Patlewicz, G. (2014) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.009 · Cited by 377
Thomas, R. S., Bahadori, T., Buckley, T. J., Cowden, J., Deisenroth, C., Dionisio, K. L., Frithsen, J. B., Grulke, C. M., Gwinn, M. R., Harrill, J. A., et al. (2019) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfz058 · Cited by 373
Self-citationSystems Toxicology: From Basic Research to Risk Assessment
Sturla, S. J., Boobis, A. R., FitzGerald, R. E., Hoeng, J., Kavlock, R. J., Schirmer, K., Whelan, M., Wilks, M. F., & Peitsch, M. C. (2014) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx400410s · Cited by 366
Bouhifd, M. (2015) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1502091 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Wambaugh, J. F., Setzer, R. W., Reif, D. M., Gangwal, S., Mitchell-Blackwood, J., Arnot, J. A., Joliet, O., Frame, A., Rabinowitz, J., Knudsen, T. B., Judson, R. S., Egeghy, P., Vallero, D., & Cohen Hubal, E. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-07-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 130711145716006
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1973903568
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Throughput Models for Exposure-Based Chemical Prioritization in the ExpoCast Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es400482g
- The paper
- Wambaugh, J. F., Setzer, R. W., Reif, D. M., Gangwal, S., Mitchell-Blackwood, J., Arnot, J. A., Joliet, O., Frame, A., Rabinowitz, J., Knudsen, T. B., Judson, R. S., Egeghy, P., Vallero, D., & Cohen Hubal, E. A. (2013). High-Throughput Models for Exposure-Based Chemical Prioritization in the ExpoCast Project. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400482g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.