Cited by 48Odor and Emission Control TechnologiesLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Volatile Constituents from Latrines

Lin, Jianming, Aoll, Jackline, Niclass, Yvan, Velazco, Maria Inés, Wünsche, Laurent, Pika, Jana, Starkenmann, Christian·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

More than 2.5 billion people defecate in the open. The increased commitment of private and public organizations to improving this situation is driving the research and development of new technologies for toilets and latrines. Although key technical aspects are considered by researchers when designing new technologies for developing countries, the basic aspect of offending malodors from human waste is often neglected. With the objective of contributing to technical solutions that are acceptable to global consumers, we investigated the chemical composition of latrine malodors sampled in Africa and India. Field latrines in four countries were evaluated olfactively and the odors qualitatively and quantitatively characterized with three analytical techniques. Sulfur compounds including H2S, methyl mercaptan, and dimethyl-mono-(di;tri) sulfide are important in sewage-like odors of pit latrines under anaerobic conditions. Under aerobic conditions, in Nairobi for example, paracresol and indole reached concentrations of 89 and 65 μg/g, respectively, which, along with short chain fatty acids such as butyric acid (13 mg/g) explained the strong rancid, manure and farm yard odor. This work represents the first qualitative and quantitative study of volatile compounds sampled from seven pit latrines in a variety of geographic, technical, and economic contexts in addition to three single stools from India and a pit latrine model system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es401677q

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, J., Aoll, J., Niclass, Y., Velazco, M. I., Wünsche, L., Pika, J., & Starkenmann, C.
Affiliations
Firmenich (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Pika, Jana
  • Starkenmann, Christian
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-07-05
Volume
47
Issue
14
Pages
7876-7882
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2332385069
Cited by
48
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Odor and Emission Control Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
volatile organic compounds, pit latrines, human waste, odor characterization, sulfur compounds, hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, indole, butyrate, short-chain fatty acids, open defecation, toilet design, anaerobic conditions, aerobic conditions, olfactory testing
MeSH terms
Feces, Humans, Odorants, Solid Phase Microextraction, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review