Cited by 50Odor and Emission Control TechnologiesAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesPolyamine Metabolism and Applications

The influence of thermal reaction and microbial transformation on the odour of human urine

Troccaz, Myriam, Niclass, Yvan, Anziani, Pauline, Starkenmann, Christian·2013·Flavour and Fragrance Journal

Abstract

The typical stale urine odour is the consequence of thermal or bacterial degradation. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, equipped with a multi‐sniffing port for olfactive evaluation (GC‐MS‐O), was performed to analyse an organic extract of boiled urine originating from seven male donors. This analysis stressed the importance of guaiacol, 2‐methoxy‐4‐ and ‐6‐methyl phenol, 4‐vinyl‐guaiacol, indole, skatole and vanillin in urine malodour. Analysis of the headspace of the highly volatile compounds showed the occurrence of trimethylamine, methyl mercaptan and dimethyl sulfide. However, odour artefacts such as pyrazines, acetyl thiazole and sugar degradation products were formed during the boiling process and represented important background noise. In parallel, fermented urine samples were judged by sniffing to be more characteristic of a urine smell, due to the presence of methional, phenol, p ‐cresol and α ‐androstenol. The two urine‐isolated Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia fergusonii and Morganella morganii (urease positive), were particularly efficient at increasing urine pH and generating phenol, p ‐cresol, indole, dimethyl sulfide and trimethylamine after 3 days of incubation of sterile male urine at 37 °C. Streptococcus agalactiae produced a high level of α ‐androstenol, whereas Micrococcus luteus CIP 103664 and isolated anaerobic bacteria did not produce any malodours. Analytical comparisons between boiled and fermented aged urine revealed that incubation of sterile urine with a bacterial mixture of E. fergusonii , Enterococcus faecalis , Citrobacter koseri , S. agalactiae and M . morganii produced a representative aged urine odour. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ffj.3143

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troccaz, M., Niclass, Y., Anziani, P., & Starkenmann, C.
Affiliations
Firmenich (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Starkenmann, Christian
Venue
Flavour and Fragrance Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-25
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
200-211
ISSN
  • 0882-5734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1026
OpenAlex
W1588432493
Cited by
50
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Flavour and Fragrance Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Odor and Emission Control Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
Keywords
urine odour, malodor, thermal degradation, bacterial degradation, guaiacol, indole, skatole, 4-vinylguaiacol, trimethylamine, methyl mercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, Escherichia fergusonii, Morganella morganii, Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterobacteriaceae, phenols, p-cresol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review