The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical and Experimental Insights into the Electrochemical Mineralization Mechanism of Perfluorooctanoic Acid
Abstract
The electrochemical mineralization mechanism of environmentally persistent perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) at a Ce-doped modified porous nanocrystalline PbO2 film anode was investigated using density functional theory (DFT) simulation and further validated experimentally. The potential energy surface was mapped out for all possible reactions during electrochemical mineralization reaction of PFOA. The hydroxyl radical (·OH), O2 and H2O took part in the mineralization process and played different roles. The ·OH-initiated process was found to be the main degradation pathway, and the existence of O2 obviously accelerated the degradation process of PFOA in aqueous solution. On the basis of the DFT calculations, an optimal electrochemical mineralization mechanism of PFOA was proposed, which involved the electronic migration, decarboxylation, radical reaction, hydrogen abstraction reaction, and radical fragmentation reaction. The proposed mechanism was verified by the dynamics and intermediate determination experiments. Furthermore, the observed ·OH concentration showed that the electrolysis system could produce enough ·OH for PFOA mineralization process, indicating that the proposed ·OH-initiated process derived from DFT calculations was feasible. These insightful findings are instrumental for a comprehensive understanding of the mineralization of PFOA in the electrolysis system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olsen, G. W., Burris, J. M., Ehresman, D. J., Froehlich, J. W., Seacat, A. M., Butenhoff, J. L., & Zobel, L. R. (2007) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.10009 · Cited by 2,049
Davis, K. L., Aucoin, M. D., Larsen, B. S., Kaiser, M. A., & Hartten, A. S. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.049 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Li, F., Duan, J., Tian, S., Ji, H., Zhu, Y., Wei, Z., & Zhao, D. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122506 · Cited by 707
Trojanowicz, M., Bojanowska-Czajka, A., Bartosiewicz, I., & Kulisa, K. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.153 · Cited by 550
Degradation and Removal Methods for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water
Merino, N., Qu, Y., Deeb, R. A., Hawley, E. L., Hoffmann, M. R., & Mahendra, S. (2016) · Environmental Engineering Science · doi:10.1089/ees.2016.0233 · Cited by 349
Physico-Chemical Processes for the Treatment of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A review
Nzeribe, B. N., Crimi, M., Mededovic Thagard, S., & Holsen, T. M. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1542916 · Cited by 314
Radjenovic, J., Duinslaeger, N., Avval, S. S., & Chaplin, B. P. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06212 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Niu, J., Lin, H., Gong, C., & Sun, X.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-12-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 14341-14349
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2039254227
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical and Experimental Insights into the Electrochemical Mineralization Mechanism of Perfluorooctanoic Acid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es402987t
- The paper
- Niu, J., Lin, H., Gong, C., & Sun, X. (2013). Theoretical and Experimental Insights into the Electrochemical Mineralization Mechanism of Perfluorooctanoic Acid. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402987t
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.