Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies to Characterize Polar Organic Contamination in Wastewater: Exploring the Capability of High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Schymanski, Emma L., Singer, Heinz P., Longrée, Philipp, Loos, Martin, Ruff, Matthias, Stravs, Michael A., Ripollés Vidal, Cristina, Hollender, Juliane·2014·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/es4044374
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Wastewater effluents contain a multitude of organic contaminants and transformation products, which cannot be captured by target analysis alone. High accuracy, high resolution mass spectrometric data were explored with novel untargeted data processing approaches (enviMass, nontarget, and RMassBank) to complement an extensive target analysis in initial "all in one" measurements. On average 1.2% of the detected peaks from 10 Swiss wastewater treatment plant samples were assigned to target compounds, with 376 reference standards available. Corrosion inhibitors, artificial sweeteners, and pharmaceuticals exhibited the highest concentrations. After blank and noise subtraction, 70% of the peaks remained and were grouped into components; 20% of these components had adduct and/or isotope information available. An intensity-based prioritization revealed that only 4 targets were among the top 30 most intense peaks (negative mode), while 15 of these peaks contained sulfur. Of the 26 nontarget peaks, 7 were tentatively identified via suspect screening for sulfur-containing surfactants and one peak was identified and confirmed as 1,3-benzothiazole-2-sulfonate, an oxidation product of a vulcanization accelerator. High accuracy, high resolution data combined with tailor-made nontarget processing methods (all available online) provided vital information for the identification of a wider range of heteroatom-containing compounds in the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es4044374

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Schwarzenbach R. P., 2006, Science, 313, 1072, 10.1126/science.1127291 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Escher B. I., 2011, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 3835, 10.1021/es1030799 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hernandez F., 2005, Trends Anal. Chem., 24, 596, 10.1016/j.trac.2005.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Moschet C., 2013, Anal. Chem., 85, 10312, 10.1021/ac4021598 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hoh E., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 8001, 10.1021/es301139q · DOI
  6. Stein S., 2012, Anal. Chem., 84, 7274, 10.1021/ac301205z · DOI · Paper page
  7. Stravs M. A., 2013, J. Mass Spectrom., 48, 89, 10.1002/jms.3131 · DOI
  8. Hernandez F., 2012, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 403, 1251, 10.1007/s00216-012-5844-7 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zedda M., 2012, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 403, 2493, 10.1007/s00216-012-5893-y · DOI
  10. Kind T., 2006, BMC Bioinform., 7, 234, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-234 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gonsior M., 2011, Water Res., 45, 2943, 10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.016 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Meringer M., 2011, Match-Commun. Math. Co., 65, 259
  13. Little J. L., 2012, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 23, 179, 10.1007/s13361-011-0265-y · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kern S., 2009, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7039, 10.1021/es901979h · DOI · Paper page
  15. Singer H., 2010, Environ. Pollut., 158, 3054, 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Götz C. W., 2010, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 17, 341, 10.1007/s11356-009-0167-8 · DOI
  17. Lara-Martin P. A., 2011, J. Chromatogr. A, 1218, 4799, 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.02.031 · DOI
  18. Corada-Fernandez C., 2011, J. Environ. Monit., 13, 2010, 10.1039/c1em10150a · DOI
  19. Lara-Martin P. A., 2010, Sci. Mar., 74, 125, 10.3989/scimar.2010.74s1125 · DOI
  20. Gonzalez S., 2008, Rapid Commun. Mass Spec., 22, 1445, 10.1002/rcm.3527 · doi:10.1002/rcm.3527
  21. Di Corcia A., 1998, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2401, 10.1021/es9801285 · DOI
  22. Di Corcia A., 1998, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 711, 10.1021/es970616x · doi:10.1021/es970616x
  23. Di Corcia A., 1999, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 4119, 10.1021/es990596u · DOI
  24. Di Corcia A., 1999, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 4112, 10.1021/es9905952 · DOI
  25. Field J. A., 1994, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 497, 10.1021/es00052a024 · doi:10.1021/es00052a024
  26. Field J. A., 1995, Water Res., 29, 1301, 10.1016/0043-1354(94)00291-E · DOI
  27. Castillo M., 2000, J. Chromatogr. A, 889, 195, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00398-8 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00398-8
  28. Horai H., 2010, J. Mass Spectrom., 45, 703, 10.1002/jms.1777 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Meringer M., 2013, Metabolites, 3, 440, 10.3390/metabo3020440 · DOI
  30. Gerlich M., 2013, J. Mass Spectrom., 48, 291, 10.1002/jms.3123 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Lara-Martin P. A., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1670, 10.1021/es9032887 · DOI
  32. De Wever H., 2001, Appl. Microbiol. Biot., 57, 620, 10.1007/s00253-001-0842-2 · DOI
  33. Schymanski E. L., 2013, Metabolites, 3, 412, 10.3390/metabo3020412 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schymanski, E. L., Singer, H. P., Longrée, P., Loos, M., Ruff, M., Stravs, M. A., Ripollés Vidal, C., & Hollender, J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2014-01-14
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
1811-1818
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/es4044374
OpenAlex
W2315565293
Cited by
414
References
2
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.