The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exposure Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Environment
Abstract
The aim of this study was to use a life-cycle perspective to model the quantities of engineered nanoparticles released into the environment. Three types of nanoparticles were studied: nano silver (nano-Ag), nano TiO2 (nano-TiO2), and carbon nanotubes (CNT). The quantification was based on a substance flow analysis from products to air, soil, and water in Switzerland. The following parameters were used as model inputs: estimated worldwide production volume, allocation of the production volume to product categories, particle release from products, and flow coefficients within the environmental compartments. The predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) were then compared to the predicted no effect concentrations (PNEC) derived from the literature to estimate a possible risk. The expected concentrations of the three nanoparticles in the different environmental compartments vary widely, caused by the different life cycles of the nanoparticle-containing products. The PEC values for nano-TiO2 in water are 0.7--16 microg/L and close to or higher than the PNEC value for nano-TiO2 (< 1 microg/L). The risk quotients (PEC/PNEC) for CNT and nano-Ag were much smaller than one, therefore comprising no reason to expect adverse effects from those particles. The results of this study make it possible for the first time to carry out a quantitative risk assessment of nanoparticles in the environment and suggest further detailed studies of nano-TiO2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities
Khan, I., Saeed, K., & Khan, I. (2019) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.011 · Cited by 6,244
Gottschalk, F., Sonderer, T., Scholz, R. W., & Nowack, B. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9015553 · Cited by 2,388
Self-citationIndustrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world
Piccinno, F., Gottschalk, F., Seeger, S., & Nowack, B. (2012) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1109-9 · Cited by 1,280
Self-citationEnvironmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: Review of modeling and analytical studies
Gottschalk, F., Sun, T., & Nowack, B. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,092
Self-citationIjaz, I., Gilani, E., Nazir, A., & Bukhari, A. (2020) · Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews · doi:10.1080/17518253.2020.1802517 · Cited by 992
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, N. C., & Nowack, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-05-09
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4447-4453
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2010516376
- Cited by
- 1,828
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exposure Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es7029637
- The paper
- Mueller, N. C., & Nowack, B. (2008). Exposure Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Environment. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7029637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.