The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sorption of Organic Contaminants by Carbon Nanotubes: Influence of Adsorbed Organic Matter
Abstract
Sorption of three types of dissolved organic matter (DOM; i.e., humic acid, peptone and alpha-phenylalanine) by a mutiwalled carbon nanotube (MWNT40) and sorption of phenanthrene (Phen), naphthalene (Naph), and 1-naphthol (1-Naph) by the original and DOM-coated MWNT40 were examined. Sorption data of Phen, Naph, and 1-Naph by all sorbents were fitted with Freundlich and Polanyi models. MWNT40 had nonlinear isotherms for all DOMs examined. Sorption of DOMs by MWNT40 followed the order peptone > humic acid > alpha-phenylalanine. The humic acid used in this study had much lower sorption for Phen, Naph, and 1-Naph than MWNT40, but its coating did not make striking changes on sorption of these compounds by MWNT40, suggesting that humic acid coating dramatically altered the physical form and surface properties of MWNT40. Peptone coating made the strongest suppression on sorption of Phen, Naph, and 1-Naph by MWNT40 among the three DOMs used, due to its highest sorption on MWNT40, thus causing a great reduction in accessibility of sorption sites. Polanyi modeling results showed that reduction in the maximum volume sorption capacity (Q0) of MWNT40 induced by DOM coating followed the order Phen < Naph < 1-Naph. 1-Naph was less hydrophobic than Phen and Naph but it had much higher sorbed volume (V(m)) than Phen and Naph at individual RT In(S(w)/C(e))/V(s)points for all sorbents. The correlation curve for the Polanyi model was applicable for sorption of aromatic compounds of similar structure by the original and DOM-coated carbon nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption-Partitioning Uptake of Nine Low-Polarity Organic Chemicals on a Natural Sorbent
Xia, G., & Ball, W. P. (1999) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es980581g · Cited by 262
Cited by
Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications: A review
Santhosh, C., Velmurugan, V., Jacob, G., Jeong, S. K., Grace, A. N., & Bhatnagar, A. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.053 · Cited by 1,256
Physical Adsorption of Charged Plastic Nanoparticles Affects Algal Photosynthesis
Bhattacharya, P., Lin, S., Turner, J. P., & Ke, P. C. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp1054759 · Cited by 1,021
Nanocatalysts and other nanomaterials for water remediation from organic pollutants
Lu, F., & Astruc, D. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213180 · Cited by 682
Lin, D., & Xing, B. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es801297u · Cited by 593
Self-citationEl‐Temsah, Y. S., & Joner, E. J. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology · doi:10.1002/tox.20610 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Lu, J., & Xing, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3207-3212
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1965774747
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorption of Organic Contaminants by Carbon Nanotubes: Influence of Adsorbed Organic Matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es702971g
- The paper
- Wang, X., Lu, J., & Xing, B. (2008). Sorption of Organic Contaminants by Carbon Nanotubes: Influence of Adsorbed Organic Matter. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702971g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.