The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanofiltration for Trace Organic Contaminant Removal: Structure, Solution, and Membrane Fouling Effects on the Rejection of Perfluorochemicals
Abstract
The use of nanofiltration (NF) membranes for water recycling requires an improved understanding of the factors that govern rejection of potentially harmful organic trace contaminants. Rejections of 15 perfluorochemicals (PFCs)--5 perfluorinated sulfonates, 9 perfluorinated carboxylates, and perfluorooctane sulfonamide (FOSA)--by four nanofiltration membranes (NF270, NF200, DK, and DL) were measured. Rejections for anionic species were >95% for MW >300 g/mol. FOSA (MW = 499 g/mol), which is uncharged at the pH of deionized water (5.6), was rejected as little as 42% (DL membrane). Decreasing the pH to less than 3 decreases rejection by up to 35%, effectively increasing the MWCO of NF270 by >200 g/mol, while a 2500 mg/L NaCl equivalent increase in ionic strength reduces rejections <1%. An alginate fouling layer increases transmission, where quantifiable, by factors of 4-8. Accumulation of PFCs on membranes was measured after the completion of rejection experiments. Based on rejection kinetics and the extent of sorption, we infer that two different sorption processes are significant: charged species adsorb quickly to the membrane surface, whereas the uncharged FOSA absorbs within the membrane matrix in a much slower process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sorption of Perfluorinated Surfactants on Sediments
Higgins, C. P., & Luthy, R. G. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es061000n · Cited by 1,563
The p K a Values of PFOA and Other Highly Fluorinated Carboxylic Acids
Goss, K.-U. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es702192c · Cited by 471
Fluorochemical Mass Flows in a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facility
Schultz, M. M., Higgins, C. P., Huset, C. A., Luthy, R. G., Barofsky, D. F., & Field, J. A. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es061025m · Cited by 432
Bioaccumulation of Perfluorochemicals in Sediments by the Aquatic Oligochaete Lumbriculus variegatus
Higgins, C. P., McLeod, P. B., MacManus-Spencer, L. A., & Luthy, R. G. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es062792o · Cited by 162
Cited by
Adsorption behavior and mechanism of perfluorinated compounds on various adsorbents—A review
Du, Z., Deng, S., Bei, Y., Huang, Q., Wang, B., Huang, J., & Yu, G. (2014) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.038 · Cited by 1,236
Rahman, M. F., Peldszus, S., & Anderson, W. B. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.045 · Cited by 1,022
Fate and Effects of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances in the Aquatic Environment: A Review
Ahrens, L., & Bundschuh, M. (2014) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.2663 · Cited by 817
A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse
Warsinger, D. M., Chakraborty, S., Tow, E. W., Plumlee, M. H., Bellona, C., Loutatidou, S., Karimi, L., Mikelonis, A. M., Achilli, A., Ghassemi, A., et al. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.004 · Cited by 747
Li, F., Duan, J., Tian, S., Ji, H., Zhu, Y., Wei, Z., & Zhao, D. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.122506 · Cited by 707
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinle-Darling, E., & Reinhard, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-06-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5292-5297
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2055749080
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.