Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Freshwater Consumption in LCA

Open access
Pfister, Stephan, Koehler, Annette, Hellweg, Stefanie·2009·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/es802423e
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A method for assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption was developed. This method considers damages to three areas of protection: human health, ecosystem quality, and resources. The method can be used within most existing life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods. The relative importance of water consumption was analyzed by integrating the method into the Eco-indicator-99 LCIA method. The relative impact of water consumption in LCIA was analyzed with a case study on worldwide cotton production. The importance of regionalized characterization factors for water use was also examined in the case study. In arid regions, water consumption may dominate the aggregated life-cycle impacts of cotton-textile production. Therefore, the consideration of water consumption is crucial in life-cycle assessment (LCA) studies that include water-intensive products, such as agricultural goods. A regionalized assessment is necessary, since the impacts of water use vary greatly as a function of location. The presented method is useful for environmental decision-support in the production of water-intensive products as well as for environmentally responsible value-chain management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es802423e

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. UNEP, 2007, Global Environment Outlook GEO 4: Environment for Development
  2. Koehler, 2008, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13, 477, 10.1007/s11367-008-0028-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Owens J. W., 2001, J. Ind. Ecol., 5, 37, 10.1162/10881980152830123 · DOI
  4. Frischknecht R., 2008, Ökobilanzen: Methode der ökologischen Knappheit−Ökofaktoren 2006
  5. Bare J., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5108, 10.1021/es052494b · DOI
  6. Shiklomanov I. A., 2003, World Water Resources at the Beginning of the 21st Century
  7. Vorosmarty C. J., 2000, Science, 289, 284, 10.1126/science.289.5477.284 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Alcamo J., 2003, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 317, 10.1623/hysj.48.3.317.45290 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Falkenmark M., 2004, Balancing Water for Humans and Nature: The New Approach in Ecohydrology
  10. Chapagain A. K., 2004, Water Footprints of Nations: Volume 1: Main Report
  11. FAO, 1999, CROPWAT for WINDOWS
  12. Alcamo J., 2000, World Water Scenarios, 243
  13. Mitchell T. D., 2005, Int. J. Climatology., 25, 693, 10.1002/joc.1181 · DOI · Paper page
  14. McMahon T. A., 2007, J. Hydrol., 347, 243, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.002 · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.002
  15. Guinée J. B., 2001, Life Cycle Assessment: An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards
  16. Goedkoop M., 2001, The Eco-Indicator 99: a Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Methodology Report
  17. Itsubo N., 2004, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 9, 196, 10.1007/BF02994194 · DOI
  18. Jolliet O., 2003, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 8, 324, 10.1007/BF02978505 · DOI · Paper page
  19. UNESCO, 2003, The United Nations World Water Development Report
  20. IWMI, 2007, Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture
  21. Yang H., 2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 3048, 10.1021/es0263689 · DOI · Paper page
  22. FAO, 2003, The State of Food Insecurity in the World (SOFI) 2003
  23. Nilsson C., 2002, Environ. Manage., 30, 468, 10.1007/s00267-002-2735-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Olson D. M., 1998, Conserv. Biol., 12, 502, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012003502.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. Falkenmark M., 2001, Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 17, 539, 10.1080/07900620120094073 · DOI
  26. Harvey F. E., 2007, Ground Water., 45, 736, 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00371.x · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00371.x
  27. Fetter C. W., 1994, Applied Hydrogeology
  28. Nemani R. R., 2003, Science, 300, 1560, 10.1126/science.1082750 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Defries R. S., 1994, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 15, 3567, 10.1080/01431169408954345 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Stewart M., 2005, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 10, 240, 10.1065/lca2004.10.184 · DOI
  31. Fritzmann C., 2007, Desalination, 216, 1, 10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
  32. von Medeazza M. G. L., 2005, Desalination, 185, 57, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.071 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kooistra K., 2006, the Sustainability of Cotton
  34. Chapagain A. K., 2006, Ecol. Econ., 60, 186, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Milzow C. L. K., 2009, Hydrogeol. J.
  36. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being

Cited by

See all 1,321

Metadata

Authors
Pfister, S., Koehler, A., & Hellweg, S.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2009-04-23
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
4098-4104
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/es802423e
OpenAlex
W2041454720
Cited by
1,321
References
1
FWCI
42.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.