The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dispersion and Toxicity of Selected Manufactured Nanomaterials in Natural River Water Samples: Effects of Water Chemical Composition
Abstract
Experimental conditions that mimic likely scenarios of manufactured nanomaterials (MNs) introduction to aquatic systems were used to assessthe effect of nanoparticle dispersion/solubility and water chemical composition on MN-toxicity. Aqueous suspensions of fullerenes (C60), nanosilver (nAg), and nanocopper (nCu) were prepared in both deionized water and filtered (0.45 microm) natural river water samples collected from the Suwannee River basin, to emphasize differences in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and solution ionic strengths (I). Two toxicity tests, the Ceriodaphnia dubia and MetPLATE bioassays were used. Results obtained from exposure studies show that water chemistry affects the suspension/solubility of MNs as well as the particle size distribution, resulting in a wide range of biological responses depending on the type of toxicity test used. Under experimental conditions used in this study, C60 exhibited no toxicity even when suspended concentrations exceeded 3 mg L(-1). MetPLATE results showed that the toxicity of aqueous suspensions of nCu tends to increase with increasing DOC concentrations, while increasing I reduces nCu toxicity. The use of the aquatic invertebrate C. dubia on the other hand showed a tendency for decreased mortality with increasing DOC and I. MetPLATE results for nAg showed decreasing trends in toxicity with increasing DOC concentrations and I. However, C. dubia exhibited contrasting biological responses, in that increasing DOC concentrations reduced toxicity, while the latter increased with increasing I. Overall, our results show that laboratory experiments that use DI-water and drastic MN-suspension methods may not be realistic as MN-dispersion and suspension in natural waters vary significantly with water chemistry and the reactivity of MNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials
Monopoli, M. P., Åberg, C., Salvati, A., & Dawson, K. A. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.207 · Cited by 3,017
Gottschalk, F., Sonderer, T., Scholz, R. W., & Nowack, B. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9015553 · Cited by 2,388
Stability of Citrate, PVP, and PEG Coated Silver Nanoparticles in Ecotoxicology Media
Tejamaya, M., Römer, I., Merrifield, R. C., & Lead, J. R. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2038596 · Cited by 608
Ivask, A., Juganson, K., Bondarenko, O., Mortimer, M., Aruoja, V., Kasemets, K., Blinova, I., Heinlaan, M., Slaveykova, V., & Kahru, A. (2014) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.855831 · Cited by 332
Aggregation and Dissolution of Silver Nanoparticles in Natural Surface Water
Li, X., & Lenhart, J. J. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es204531y · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, J., Youn, S., Hovsepyan, A., Llaneza, V. L., Wang, Y., Bitton, G., & Bonzongo, J.-C. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-04-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3322-3328
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1969025229
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispersion and Toxicity of Selected Manufactured Nanomaterials in Natural River Water Samples: Effects of Water Chemical Composition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es803315v
- The paper
- Gao, J., Youn, S., Hovsepyan, A., Llaneza, V. L., Wang, Y., Bitton, G., & Bonzongo, J.-C. J. (2009). Dispersion and Toxicity of Selected Manufactured Nanomaterials in Natural River Water Samples: Effects of Water Chemical Composition. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es803315v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.