The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) in Biofouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes
Abstract
This study elucidates the mechanisms by which extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) impact permeate water flux and salt rejection during biofouling of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. RO fouling experiments were conducted with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, EPS extracted from PAO1 biofilms, and dead PAO1 cells fixed in formaldehyde. While a biofouling layer of dead bacterial cells decreases salt rejection and permeate flux by a biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure mechanism, the EPS biofouling layer adversely impacts permeate flux by increasing the hydraulic resistance to permeate flow. During controlled fouling experiments with extracted EPS in a simulated wastewater solution, polysaccharides adsorbed on the RO membranes much more effectively than proteins (adsorption efficiencies of 61.2-88.7% and 11.6-12.4% for polysaccharides and proteins, respectively). Controlled fouling experiments with EPS in sodium chloride solutions supplemented with 0.5 mM calcium ions (total ionic strength of 15 mM) indicate that calcium increases the adsorption efficiency of polysaccharides and DNA by 2- and 3-fold, respectively. The increased adsorption of EPS onto the membrane resulted in a significant decrease in permeate water flux. Corroborating with these calcium effects, atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements demonstrated that addition of calcium ions to the feed solution results in a marked increase in the adhesion forces between a carboxylated particle probe and the EPS layer. The increase in the interfacial adhesion forces is attributed to specific EPS-calcium interactions that play a major role in biofouling of RO membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269
A Survey of Structure−Property Relationships of Surfaces that Resist the Adsorption of Protein
Ostuni, E., Chapman, R. G., Holmlin, R. E., Takayama, S., & Whitesides, G. M. (2001) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la010384m · Cited by 1,799
Cited by
Surface Modification of Water Purification Membranes
Miller, D. J., Dreyer, D. R., Bielawski, C. W., Paul, D. R., & Freeman, B. D. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201601509 · Cited by 747
A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse
Warsinger, D. M., Chakraborty, S., Tow, E. W., Plumlee, M. H., Bellona, C., Loutatidou, S., Karimi, L., Mikelonis, A. M., Achilli, A., Ghassemi, A., et al. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.01.004 · Cited by 747
Qu, F., Liang, H., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Yu, H., & Li, G. (2012) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.051 · Cited by 301
Alexander, J., Knopp, G., Dötsch, A., Wieland, A., & Schwartz, T. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.154 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Herzberg, M., Kang, S., & Elimelech, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-05-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4393-4398
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2032508094
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) in Biofouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es900087j
- The paper
- Herzberg, M., Kang, S., & Elimelech, M. (2009). Role of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) in Biofouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900087j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.