The DOI matches its Crossref record.
XAFS Investigation of the Interactions of UVI with Secondary Mineralization Products from the Bioreduction of FeIII Oxides
Abstract
Biogenic Fe(II) phases (magnetite, green rust, siderite, vivianite, etc.) provide a reservoir of reducing capacity in many subsurface environments that may contribute to the reduction of contaminants such as U(VI). We have examined the uptake and reduction of U(VI) in the presence of biogenic green rust (BioGR), magnetite (BioMAG), and siderite (BioSID) formed during the reduction of Fe(III) oxides by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32. Within 48 h, total solution-phase U(VI) concentrations decreased from 500 microM to 1.5 microM, 392 microM, and 472 microM in the U-BioGR, U-BioMAG, and U-BioSID systems, respectively. Analysis of the samples by U L(III) extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (EXAFS) indicated that despite a stoichiometric excess of Fe(II), no more than 6% of U(VI) was reduced to U(IV) in the U-BioSID system, and no more than 22% of U(VI) was reduced in the U-BioMAG system. For comparison, in the U-BioGR system, >99% of U(VI) was reduced to U(IV). Uptake of U(VI) by BioGR and BioMAG was accompanied by formation of nanoparticulate uraninite. The U EXAFS data for the U-BioSID system were consistent with partial U(VI)/U(IV) substitution for Fe(II) in the surface layer of siderite particles and adsorption of U(IV).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fe(II) is a reductant for a wide range of contaminants, however, the redox reactivity of Fe(II) depends strongly on its speciation [127-131].”
From Electron Donor Utilization and Secondary Mineral Formation during the Bioreduction of Lepidocrocite by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 (2019) · cites this paper as [131]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Elsner M., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 799, 10.1021/es0345569 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee W., 2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 535, 10.1021/es025830m · DOI · Paper page
- Scheinost A. C., 2008, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 1984, 10.1021/es071573f · DOI · Paper page
- Scheinost A. C., 2008, J. Contam. Hydrol., 102, 228, 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.09.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Gregory K. B., 2001, Biogeochemical removal of RDX using iron oxide and Geobacter metallireducens GS-15
- McCormick M. L., 1998, Abiotic transformation of chlorinated solvents as a consequence of microbial iron reduction: An investigation of the role of biogenic magnetite in mediating reductive dechlorination, 339
- Lovley D. R., 1991, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 1062, 10.1021/es00018a007 · DOI
- Kukkadapu R. K., 2005, Am. Mineral., 90, 510, 10.2138/am.2005.1727 · DOI
- McCormick M. L., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1045, 10.1021/es030487m · DOI
- O’Loughlin E. J., 2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 721, 10.1021/es0208409 · DOI
- O’Loughlin E. J., 2007, Geomicrobiol. J., 24, 211, 10.1080/01490450701459333 · DOI · Paper page
- Kelly S. D., 2002, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 66, 3855, 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00947-X · DOI
- Kelly S. D., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2262, 10.1021/es051970v · DOI
- Bargar J. R., 2000, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 64, 2737, 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00398-7 · DOI
- Bostick B. C., 2002, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66, 99, 10.2136/sssaj2002.9900 · DOI
- Waite T. D., 1994, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 58, 5465, 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90243-7 · DOI
- Burns P. C., 1999, Uranium: Mineralogy, geochemistry and the environment, 23, 10.1515/9781501509193-007 · DOI
- Wander M. C. F., 2007, J. Phy. Chem. C, 111, 11414, 10.1021/jp072762n · DOI
- Missana T., 2003, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 261, 154, 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00227-8 · DOI
- Scott T. B., 2005, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 69, 5639, 10.1016/j.gca.2005.07.003 · DOI
- Jeon B.-H., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 5642, 10.1021/es0487527 · DOI
- Ithurbide A., 2009, Radiochim. Acta, 97, 177, 10.1524/ract.2009.1614 · DOI
- Duff M. C., 2002, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 66, 3533, 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)00953-5 · DOI
- Nico P. S., 2009, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7391, 10.1021/es900515q · DOI
- Fredrickson J. K., 2000, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 64, 3085, 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00397-5 · DOI
- Behrends T., 2005, Chem. Geol., 220, 315, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.04.007 · DOI
- Finneran K. T., 2002, Soil Sediment Contam., 11, 339, 10.1080/20025891106781 · DOI
- Senko J. M., 2007, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 71, 4644, 10.1016/j.gca.2007.07.021 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uranium isotopes fingerprint biotic reduction
Stylo, M., Neubert, N., Wang, Y., Monga, N., Romaniello, S. J., Weyer, S., & Bernier-Latmani, R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421841112 · Cited by 166
O’Loughlin, E. J., Gorski, C. A., Flynn, T. M., & Scherer, M. M. (2019) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min9070434 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Loughlin, E. J., Kelly, S. D., & Kemner, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Biosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439-4843, and EXAFS Analysis, Bolingbrook, Illinois 60440
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-02-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1656-1661
- ISSN
- 0013-936X
- 1520-5851
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review