Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Production and Loss of Methylmercury and Loss of Total Mercury from Boreal Forest Catchments Containing Different Types of Wetlands

St. Louis, Vincent L., Rudd, John W. M., Kelly, Carol A., Beaty, Ken G., Flett, Robert J., Roulet, Nigel T.·1996·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Four terrestrial boreal forest catchments containing different types of wetlands were studied to determine their strength as sources or sinks of methylmercury (MeHg) and total mercury (THg) to downstream ecosystems and to determine if patterns seen in one year were consistent over several years. All catchments were sinks for THg. The wetland type, percentage wetland area (0−25%), or annual water yield did not appear to have a consistent effect on the magnitude of this retention. Wetland areas of the catchments were always net sources of MeHg. Unlike for THg, there were large and consistent differences in the source strength among wetland types for MeHg. These differences appeared to be related to differences in the internal hydrology of the wetlands. All types of wetlands were greater sources of MeHg during years of high water yield, but even during years of low flow all wetland types were sources of MeHg. Thus, we conclude that wetlands are important sites of MeHg production in boreal ecosystems on the long term. Upland areas of catchments were consistently sinks for MeHg, and so whole catchment sink/source values were strongly affected by the percentage of wetland areas within a catchment. Mass balance estimates of MeHg input from wetland areas to a lake indicate that the annual input of MeHg from wetlands is larger than the annual uptake of Hg by fish and is similar to the amount of MeHg produced in the lake. Because of the predictable patterns between terrestrial catch ments in their strength as sources or sinks of MeHg, it is possible to model inputs of MeHg from lake catchments with knowledge of the percentage wetland area in a catchment, the type of wetland contained in a catchment, and the annual water yield of a catchment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es950856h

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
St. Louis, V. L., Rudd, J. W. M., Kelly, C. A., Beaty, K. G., Flett, R. J., & Roulet, N. T.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1996-08-01
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
2719-2729
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2037102663
Cited by
327
References
0
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production and Loss of Methylmercury and Loss of Total Mercury from Boreal Forest Catchments Containing Different Types of Wetlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es950856h
The paper
St. Louis, V. L., Rudd, J. W. M., Kelly, C. A., Beaty, K. G., Flett, R. J., & Roulet, N. T. (1996). Production and Loss of Methylmercury and Loss of Total Mercury from Boreal Forest Catchments Containing Different Types of Wetlands. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es950856h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.