The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adsorption and Stability of Arsenic(III) at the Clay Mineral−Water Interface
Abstract
Adsorption and oxidation reactions of arsenite (As(III)) at the mineral−water interface are two important factors affecting the fate and transport of arsenic in the environ ment. Numerous studies have concluded that As(III) is more soluble and mobile than arsenate (As(V)) in soils, though very little experimental work has demonstrated the differences in reactivity and stability of As(III) and As(V) at the mineral−water interface. In this investigation, As(III) adsorption on kaolinite, illite, montmorillonite, and amorphous aluminum hydroxide (am-Al(OH) 3 ) was studied as a function of pH and ionic strength and was compared with As(V) adsorption. High-performance liquid chromatog raphy−hydride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry (HPLC−HGAAS) was employed for direct determination of As(III) and As(V). In addition, surface complexation modeling was used to describe As(III) and As(V) adsorption on the four minerals. It was revealed that alkaline solutions (pH > 9) without mineral solids caused homogeneous oxidation of As(III) to As(V). In addition, recovery of adsorbed As from As(III)-treated clay mineral solids showed that oxidation of As(III) to As(V) was enhanced by heterogeneous oxidation on kaolinite and illite surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of pH on Adsorption of Arsenic and Selenium from Landfill Leachate by Clay Minerals
Frost, R. R., & Griffin, R. A. (1977) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100010019x · Cited by 268
Cited by
A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters
Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(02)00018-5 · Cited by 7,691
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Aquatic arsenic: Toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation
Sharma, V. K., & Sohn, M. (2009) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2009.01.005 · Cited by 1,119
Competitive Adsorption of Arsenate and Arsenite on Oxides and Clay Minerals
Goldberg, S. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.4130 · Cited by 674
Self-citationArsenate Adsorption on an Fe−Ce Bimetal Oxide Adsorbent: Role of Surface Properties
Zhang, Y., Yang, M., Dou, X.-M., He, H., & Wang, D.-S. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050775d · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, B. A., & Goldberg, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1997-06-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2005-2011
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1969235078
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.