Cited by 69

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bile Acids as a New Class of Sewage Pollution Indicator

Elhmmali, Mohamed M., Roberts, David J., Evershed, Richard P.·1997·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The bile acid content of raw sewage, treated effluent, and estuarine sediment was determined as the first step in the development of bile acids as a new class of sewage pollution indicator. Sediments and particulates from raw sewage and effluent, were solvent extracted, saponified, fractionated by solid phase extraction (SPE) and “flash” column chromatography, derivatized, and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and GC/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Mass spectral comparisons confirmed unambiguously the presence of bile acids in all the samples studied. The major compounds detected were deoxycholic and lithocholic acids, together with minor components, in a characteristic distribution that reflected the predominantly human origin of the effluent. Bile acids were found to exist in a “bound” form and were released upon saponification. They were found to be quantitatively relatively more resistant to degradation during sewage treatment as compared to coprostanol. Some changes were observed in the abundances of certain minor bile acids, for example, the 3β-epimers were much reduced in relative abundance in the treated effluent and sediment as compared to their 3α counterparts. Bile acids offer considerable promise as indicators of specific sources of sewage pollution, particularly if used in conjunction with the widely employed 5β-stanols, e.g., coprostanol.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es9704040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Geldenhuys J. C., 1989, Water Sci. Technol., 21, 109, 10.2166/wst.1989.0086 · DOI
  2. McFeters G. A., 1986, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 51, 5, 10.1128/aem.51.1.1-5.1986 · DOI
  3. Landry E. F., 1983, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 45, 247, 10.1128/aem.45.1.238-247.1983 · DOI
  4. Nichols P. D., 1993, J. Chromatogr., 643, 195, 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80552-J · DOI
  5. Dutka B. J., 1974, Water Res., 8, 1055, 10.1016/0043-1354(74)90147-X · DOI
  6. Grimalt J. O., 1990, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 363, 10.1021/es00073a011 · DOI
  7. McCalley D. V., 1981, Water Res., 15, 1025, 10.1016/0043-1354(81)90211-6 · DOI
  8. Venkatesan M. I., 1990, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 214, 10.1021/es00072a009 · DOI
  9. Laureillarnd J., 1993, Mar. Chem., 43, 261
  10. Nicholls P. D., 1992, Water, 19, 33
  11. Kirchmer C. J. Ph.D., 1971, University of Florida
  12. Murtaugh J. J., 1967, J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 39, 409
  13. Walker R. W., 1982, CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control, 12, 112
  14. Leeming R., 1994, Chem. Aust., 61, 435
  15. Eneroth P., 1964, J. Lipid Res., 5, 263, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)40246-9 · DOI
  16. Gaskell S. J., 1975, Nature, 254, 211, 10.1038/254209b0 · DOI
  17. Teshima S., 1978, Mem. Fac. Fish. Kagoshima Univ., 27, 47
  18. Teshima S., 1978, Nippon Suisan Gakkaiski, 44, 1268
  19. Teshima S., 1978, J. Oceanogr. Soc. Jpn., 34, 92, 10.1007/BF02109257 · DOI
  20. Hassett J. P., 1977, Water Res., 11, 989, 10.1016/0043-1354(77)90156-7 · DOI
  21. Attaway D., 1970, Science, 169, 676, 10.1126/science.169.3946.674 · DOI
  22. Rhead M. M., 1971, Chem. Geol., 8, 297, 10.1016/0009-2541(71)90022-2 · DOI
  23. Nishimura M., 1977, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 41, 385
  24. Knights B. A., 1983, J. Archaeol. Sci., 10, 152, 10.1016/0305-4403(83)90048-1 · DOI
  25. Bethell P. H., 1994, J. Archaeol. Sci., 21, 631, 10.1006/jasc.1994.1061 · DOI
  26. Evershed, R. P.; Bethell, P. H. In Archaeological Chemistry ; Orna, M. V., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1996; pp 157−172. · DOI
  27. Evershed R., 1997, J. Archaeol. Sci., 24, 495, 10.1006/jasc.1996.0132 · DOI
  28. Eneroth P., 1966, J. Lipid Res., 7, 523
  29. Setchell K. D. R., 1983, J. Lipid Res., 24, 1100
  30. Björkhem, 1985, Sterols and Bile Acids, 12, 278, 10.1016/S0167-7306(08)60685-7 · DOI
  31. Subbiah M. T. R., 1976, J. Lipid Res., 17, 84
  32. Czubayko F., 1991, J. Lipid Res., 32, 1867, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)41640-2 · DOI
  33. Elliott W., 1972, Biochemical Applications of Mass Spectrometry, 311
  34. Kaluzny M. A., 1985, J. Lipid Res., 26, 140, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34412-6 · DOI
  35. Gülaçar F. O., 1990, J. Archaeol. Sci., 17, 705
  36. Kawamura K., 1987, J. Chromatogr., 390, 377, 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)94388-2 · DOI
  37. Harris W. S., 1977, J. Chromatogr., 131, 441, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)80965-6 · DOI
  38. Sjövall, J.; Eneroth, P.; Ryhage, R. In The Bile Acids ; Nair, P. P., Kritchevsky, D., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1971; Vol. 1, pp 209−248. · DOI
  39. Matschiner J. T., 1971, New York, 1, 46

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elhmmali, M. M., Roberts, D. J., & Evershed, R. P.
Affiliations
Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Cantock's Close, Bristol, BS8 1TS, U.K.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1997-11-26
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
3663-3668
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
Cited by
69
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review