The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sorption of Selected Organic Compounds from Water to a Peat Soil and Its Humic-Acid and Humin Fractions: Potential Sources of the Sorption Nonlinearity
Abstract
The sorption isotherms of ethylene dibromide (EDB), diuron (DUN), and 3,5-dichlorophenol (DCP) from water on the humic acid and humin fractions of a peat soil and on the humic-acid of a muck soil have been measured. The data were compared with those of the solutes with the whole peat from which the humic-acid (HA) and humin (HM) fractions were derived and on which the sorption of the solutes exhibited varying extents of nonlinear capacities at low relative concentrations ( C e / S w ). The HA fraction as prepared by the density-fractionated method is relatively pure and presumably free of high-surface-area carbonaceous material (HSACM) that is considered to be responsible for the observed nonlinear sorption for nonpolar solutes (e.g., EDB) on the peat; conversely, the base-insoluble HM fraction as prepared is presumed to be enriched with HSACM, as manifested by the greatly higher BET-(N 2 ) surface area than that of the whole peat. The sorption of EDB on HA exhibits no visible nonlinear effect, whereas the sorption on HM shows an enhanced nonlinearity over that on the whole peat. The sorption of polar DUN and DCP on HA and HM display nonlinear effects comparable with those on the whole peat; the effects are much more significant than those with nonpolar EDB. These results conform to the hypothesis that adsorption onto a small amount of strongly adsorbing HSACM is largely responsible for the nonlinear sorption of nonpolar solutes on soils and that additional specific interactions with the active groups of soil organic matter are responsible for the generally higher nonlinear sorption of the polar solutes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption-Partitioning Uptake of Nine Low-Polarity Organic Chemicals on a Natural Sorbent
Xia, G., & Ball, W. P. (1999) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es980581g · Cited by 262
Cited by
Sarmah, A. K., Meyer, M. T., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 · Cited by 3,326
Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars
Chun, Y., Sheng, G., Chiou, C. T., & Xing, B. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es035034w · Cited by 1,079
Huang, W., Peng, P., Yu, Z., & Fu, J. (2003) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(02)00205-6 · Cited by 435
Phenanthrene Sorption to Sequentially Extracted Soil Humic Acids and Humins
Kang, S., & Xing, B. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0490828 · Cited by 317
Enhanced Pesticide Sorption by Soils Containing Particulate Matter from Crop Residue Burns
Yang, Y., & Sheng, G. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es034006a · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiou, C. T., Kile, D. E., Rutherford, D. W., Sheng, G., & Boyd, S. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-03-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1254-1258
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2036636752
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorption of Selected Organic Compounds from Water to a Peat Soil and Its Humic-Acid and Humin Fractions: Potential Sources of the Sorption Nonlinearity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es990261c
- The paper
- Chiou, C. T., Kile, D. E., Rutherford, D. W., Sheng, G., & Boyd, S. A. (2000). Sorption of Selected Organic Compounds from Water to a Peat Soil and Its Humic-Acid and Humin Fractions: Potential Sources of the Sorption Nonlinearity. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es990261c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.