Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solid-Solution Partitioning of Metals in Contaminated Soils: Dependence on pH, Total Metal Burden, and Organic Matter

Sauvé, Sébastien, Hendershot, William, Allen, Herbert E.·2000·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Environmental risk assessment of metals depends to a great extent on modeling the fate and the mobility of metals based on soil−liquid partitioning coefficients. A large variability is observed among the reported values that could be used to predict metal mobility and bioavailability. To evaluate this, soil−liquid partitioning coefficients ( K d ) for many elements but especially for the metals cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc were compiled from over 70 studies of various origins collected from the literature. The relationships between the reported values are explored relative to variations in soil solution pH, soil organic matter (SOM), and concentrations of total soil metal. The results of multiple linear regressions show that K d values are best predicted using empirical linear regressions with pH (with R 2 values of 0.29−0.58) or with pH and either the log of SOM or the log of total metal and with resulting R 2 values of 0.42−0.76. A semi-mechanistic model based on the competitive adsorption of metal and H + [dependent on solution pH, total metal content, and log(SOM)] was a better tool to predict dissolved metal concentrations (with R 2 values of 0.61−0.88), with the exception of Pb (at 0.35).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es9907764

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sauvé, S., Hendershot, W., & Allen, H. E.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2000-02-26
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1125-1131
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2063177163
Cited by
1,171
References
1
FWCI
25.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.