Cited by 76Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Do salt and low temperature impair metal treatment in stormwater bioretention cells with or without a submerged zone?

Søberg, Laila C., Viklander, Maria, Blecken, Godecke-Tobias·2017·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Although seasonal temperature changes and (road) salt in winter and/or coastal stormwater runoff might interfere with the metal treatment performance of stormwater bioretention cells, no previous study has evaluated the effect of these factors and their interactions under controlled conditions. In this 18week long study 24 well established pilot-scale bioretention columns were employed to evaluate the individual and combined effect(s) of low/high temperature, salt and presence of a submerged zone with an embedded carbon source on metal removal using a three factor, two-level full factorial experimental design. In most instances, the three factors significantly influenced the metal outflow concentrations and thus the treatment performance; the effect of temperature depended on the metal in question, salt had an overall negative effect and the submerged zone with carbon source had an overall positive effect. Despite these statistically significant effects, the discharge water quality was generally markedly improved. However, leaching of dissolved Cu and Pb did occur, mainly from bioretention cells dosed with salt-containing stormwater. The highest concentrations of metals were captured in the top layer of the filter material and were not significantly affected by the three factors studied. Overall, the results confirmed that bioretention provides a functioning stormwater treatment option in areas experiencing winter conditions (road salt, low temperatures) or coastal regions (s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.179

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Søberg, L. C., Viklander, M., & Blecken, G.-T.
Affiliations
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Søberg, Laila C.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
579
Pages
1588-1599
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558503897
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Swedish Research Council FORMAS (2010-787)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
metal removal, road salt, low temperature, submerged zone, carbon source, copper, lead, filter media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review