Do salt and low temperature impair metal treatment in stormwater bioretention cells with or without a submerged zone?
Abstract
Although seasonal temperature changes and (road) salt in winter and/or coastal stormwater runoff might interfere with the metal treatment performance of stormwater bioretention cells, no previous study has evaluated the effect of these factors and their interactions under controlled conditions. In this 18week long study 24 well established pilot-scale bioretention columns were employed to evaluate the individual and combined effect(s) of low/high temperature, salt and presence of a submerged zone with an embedded carbon source on metal removal using a three factor, two-level full factorial experimental design. In most instances, the three factors significantly influenced the metal outflow concentrations and thus the treatment performance; the effect of temperature depended on the metal in question, salt had an overall negative effect and the submerged zone with carbon source had an overall positive effect. Despite these statistically significant effects, the discharge water quality was generally markedly improved. However, leaching of dissolved Cu and Pb did occur, mainly from bioretention cells dosed with salt-containing stormwater. The highest concentrations of metals were captured in the top layer of the filter material and were not significantly affected by the three factors studied. Overall, the results confirmed that bioretention provides a functioning stormwater treatment option in areas experiencing winter conditions (road salt, low temperatures) or coastal regions (s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reported removals of dissolved metals are fewer and contradictory, including both efficient removal and significant leaching.
“However, reported removals of dissolved metals are fewer and contradictory including both efficient removal and significant leaching (e.g. Muthanna et al., 2007; Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Søberg et al., 2017
Metals can negatively affect the ecological status of surface waters depending on their prevalence, toxicity and resistance to degradation and/or chemical transformation.
“Depending on their prevalence, toxicity and resistance to degradation and/or chemical transformation metals might negatively affect the ecological status of surface waters (Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Søberg et al., 2017
A large number of field and laboratory studies have shown efficient total metal removal for bioretention systems, often exceeding 80-90%.
“A large number of field and laboratory studies have shown efficient total metal removal for bioretention systems, often exceeding 80–90% (e.g. Hatt et al., 2008; Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Søberg et al., 2017
Several pilot-scale studies have shown LTU top-layer to be an efficient metal adsorbent.
“Several pilot-scale studies (Blecken et al., 2011; Søberg et al., 2017) have shown this material to be an efficient metal adsorbent.”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Søberg et al., 2017
LTU-TOP efficiently removed metals in pilot-scale bioretention facilities under various ambient conditions, despite showing very low adsorption capacities in the present study.
“Although it showed very low adsorption capacities in the present study (Fig. 2), LTU-TOP efficiently removed metals in pilot-scale bioretention facilities under various ambient conditions (e.g. Blecken et al., 2009; Blecken et al., 2011; Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Søberg et al., 2017
It has been commonly observed that a majority of metal adsorption happens in the upper layers of bioretention.
“It has been commonly observed that a majority of metal adsorption happens in the upper layers of bioretention (e.g. Søberg et al., 2017) which would support the assumption of rather quick adsorption processes.”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Søberg et al., 2017
Metals primarily accumulate in the top 5 cm of bioretention filter materials.
“The latter becomes evident considering that metals primarily accumulate in the top 5 cm of bioretention filter materials (e.g. Søberg et al., 2017).”
From Dissolved metal adsorption capacities and fractionation in filter materials for use in stormwater bioretention facilities (2019) · cites this paper as Søberg et al., 2017
Cites
Storm water runoff concentration matrix for urban areas
Göbel, P., Dierkes, C., & Coldewey, W. G. (2007) · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.08.008 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Priority Pollutants in Urban Stormwater: Part 1 — Case of Separate Storm Sewers
Zgheib, S., Moilleron, R., & Chebbo, G. (2012) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.012 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Snowmelt pollutant removal in bioretention areas
Muthanna, T. M., Viklander, M., Blecken, G., & Thorolfsson, S. T. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.040 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gasperi, J., Le Roux, J., Deshayes, S., Ayrault, S., Bordier, L., Boudahmane, L., Budzinski, H., Caupos, E., Caubrière, N., Flanagan, K., et al. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14030394 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Søberg, L. C., Winston, R., Viklander, M., & Blecken, G.-T. (2019) · Water Research X · doi:10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100032 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Several pilot-scale studies (Blecken et al., 2011; Søberg et al., 2017) have shown this material to be an efficient metal adsorbent.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Søberg, L. C., Viklander, M., & Blecken, G.-T.
- Affiliations
- Luleå University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Søberg, Laila C.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 579
- Pages
- 1588-1599
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2558503897
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Swedish Research Council FORMAS (2010-787)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- metal removal, road salt, low temperature, submerged zone, carbon source, copper, lead, filter media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review