Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Concentrations and Mass Fluxes of Chloroacetic Acids and Trifluoroacetic Acid in Rain and Natural Waters in Switzerland

Open access
Berg, Michael, Müller, Stephan R., Mühlemann, Jürg, Wiedmer, Adrian, Schwarzenbach, René P.·2000·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Chloroacetic acids (CAAs) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) are widely distributed environmental pollutants. The origin of CAAs is still under debate, while TFA is considered to be a major atmospheric degradation product of recently introduced hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Because of the phytotoxic potential of the CAAs, i.e., monochloroacetic acid (MCA), dichloroacetic acid (DCA), and trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and the persistence of TFA, these compounds are of considerable environmental concern. Hence, it is important to know their fluxes and their spatial and temporal distribution in the environment. In this study, the occurrence and mass fluxes of MCA, DCA, TCA, and TFA were assessed on a regional scale over Switzerland, based on more than 1000 concentration measurements in rain and snow, surface water, groundwater, and wastewater. Among different precipitation events, the measured concentrations varied significantly from <11 to 7100 ng/L. However, no statistically different average haloacetic acid (HAA) concentrations among six precipitation sampling sites located in various areas in Switzerland were observed (range of average concentrations: MCA 1430−2770 ng/L, DCA 390−1370 ng/L, TCA 95−380 ng/L, TFA 33−220 ng/L). The similar average HAA concentrations in precipitation at a remote site close to the free troposphere at an elevation of 3580 m above sea level (Jungfraujoch) and at a site that receives precipitation which scavenged the Earth's boundary layer (urban site Dübendorf/Zürich) suggests that HAAs are derived from well-mixed precursor(s) in the atmosphere. When moving from precipitation to surface waters (i.e., rivers), the TFA/CAA ratios increased by a factor of 10−11 for TFA/MCA and TFA/DCA and by a factor of 1.2 for TFA/TCA. Mass flux calculations show that precipitation is the dominant source of the HAAs, particularly of MCA, DCA, and TFA (>95%). In the case of TCA, wastewater effluents contributed 27% of the total input. The results further indicate that, as compared to the CAAs, TFA is quite persistent in the aquatic and terrestrial environment and may thus accumulate in soils and groundwater.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es990855f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Berg, M., Müller, S. R., Mühlemann, J., Wiedmer, A., & Schwarzenbach, R. P.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
34
Issue
13
Pages
2675-2683
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2002899934
Cited by
188
References
1
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.