The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxidative Damage by Ruthenium Complexes Containing the Dipyridophenazine Ligand or Its Derivatives: A Focus on Intercalation
Abstract
Interactions with DNA by a family of ruthenium(II) complexes bearing the dppz (dppz = dipyridophenazine) ligand or its derivatives have been examined. The complexes include Ru(bpy)(2)(dppx)(2+) (dppx = 7,8-dimethyldipyridophenazine), Ru(bpy)(2)(dpq)(2+) (dpq = dipyridoquinoxaline), and Ru(bpy)(2)(dpqC)(2+) (dpqC = dipyrido-6,7,8,9-tetrahydrophenazine). Their ground and excited state oxidation/reduction potentials have been determined using cyclic voltammetry and fluorescence spectroscopy. An intercalative binding mode has been established on the basis of luminescence enhancements in the presence of DNA, excited state quenching, fluorescence polarization values, and enantioselectivity. Oxidative damage to DNA by these complexes using the flash/quench method has been examined. A direct correlation between the amount of guanine oxidation obtained via DNA charge transport and the strength of intercalative binding was observed. Oxidative damage to DNA through DNA-mediated charge transport was also compared directly for two DNA-tethered ruthenium complexes. One contains the dppz ligand that binds avidly by intercalation, and the other contains only bpy ligands, that, while bound covalently, can only associate with the base pairs through groove binding. Long range oxidative damage was observed only with the tethered, intercalating complex. These results, taken together, all support the importance of close association and intercalation for DNA-mediated charge transport. Electronic access to the DNA base pairs, provided by intercalation of the oxidant, is a prerequisite for efficient charge transport through the DNA pi-stack.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxidative Nucleobase Modifications Leading to Strand Scission
Burrows, C. J., & Muller, J. G. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960421s · Cited by 1,736
Steenken, S., & Jovanovic, S. V. (1997) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja962255b · Cited by 1,450
Long-Range Charge Transfer in DNA: Transient Structural Distortions Control the Distance Dependence
Schuster, G. B. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar980059z · Cited by 778
DNA−Protein Cross-Linking from Oxidation of Guanine via the Flash−Quench Technique
Nguyen, K. L., Steryo, M., Kurbanyan, K., Nowitzki, K. M., Butterfield, S. M., Ward, S. R., & Stemp, E. D. A. (2000) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja993502p · Cited by 59
Cited by
Mechanisms for DNA Charge Transport
Genereux, J. C., & Barton, J. K. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900228f · Cited by 787
Self-citationZhang, Y., Schulz, M., Wächtler, M., Karnahl, M., & Dietzek, B. (2018) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.10.016 · Cited by 346
Dhar, S., Senapati, D., Das, P. K., Chattopadhyay, P., Nethaji, M., & Chakravarty, A. R. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja036681q · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Delaney, S., Pascaly, M., Bhattacharya, P. K., Han, K., & Barton, J. K.
- Venue
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-03-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1966-1974
- ISSN
- 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-510X
- OpenAlex
- W2043213122
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxidative Damage by Ruthenium Complexes Containing the Dipyridophenazine Ligand or Its Derivatives: A Focus on Intercalation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ic0111738
- The paper
- Delaney, S., Pascaly, M., Bhattacharya, P. K., Han, K., & Barton, J. K. (2002). Oxidative Damage by Ruthenium Complexes Containing the Dipyridophenazine Ligand or Its Derivatives: A Focus on Intercalation. Inorganic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0111738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.