The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanistic Studies of a Calcium-Dependent MRI Contrast Agent
Abstract
Intracellular Ca(2+) plays an important role in signal transduction, and we are developing new MRI techniques to study its regulation in living animals. We have reported on an MRI contrast agent (DOPTA-Gd) where the relaxivity of the complex is controlled by the presence or absence of the divalent ion Ca(2+). By structurally modulating inner-sphere access of water to a chelated Gd(3+) ion, we observe a substantial and reversible change in T(1) upon the addition of Ca(2+) and not other divalent ions. Luminescence lifetime and NMRD measurements of the complex have been acquired, and several parameters contribute to the Ca(2+) dependent relaxivity change of DOPTA-Gd. The number of inner-sphere water molecules is more than doubled after the Ca(2+) concentration is increased. This finding strongly supports the proposed conformational change of DOPTA-Gd when Ca(2+) is bound. Relaxometric measurements confirm these results and provide an indication that second-sphere water molecules are probably responsible for paramagnetic relaxation enhancement in the absence of Ca(2+). After Ca(2+) is bound to DOPTA-Gd, the molecule undergoes a substantial conformational change that opens up the hydrophilic face of the tetraazacyclododecane macrocycle. This change dramatically increases the accessibility of chelated Gd(3+) ion to bulk solvent. The design of this class of calcium-activated MR contrast agent was based primarily on the assumption that the number of coordinated inner-sphere water molecules would be the dominating factor in observed relaxivity measurements. This result has been confirmed; however, careful mechanistic studies reveal that additional factors are involved in this process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers
Wahsner, J., Gale, E. M., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A., & Caravan, P. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00363 · Cited by 1,603
Lanthanide Probes for Bioresponsive Imaging
Heffern, M. C., Matosziuk, L. M., & Meade, T. J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400477t · Cited by 1,202
Self-citationBioresponsive, Cell-Penetrating, and Multimeric MR Contrast Agents
Major, J. L., & Meade, T. J. (2009) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar800245h · Cited by 321
Self-citationQue, E. L., & Chang, C. J. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b914348n · Cited by 263
Bartelle, B. B., Barandov, A., & Jasanoff, A. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4050-15.2016 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W.-H., Parigi, G., Fragai, M., Luchinat, C., & Meade, T. J.
- Venue
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-06-28
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4018-4024
- ISSN
- 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-510X
- OpenAlex
- W1984163069
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.