Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework as Formaldehyde Gas Sensor

Chen, Er-Xia, Yang, Hui, Zhang, Jian·2014·Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract

Traditional semiconducting metal oxide-based gas sensors are always limited on low surface areas and high operating temperatures. Considering the high surface area and high stability of zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF), ZIF-67 (surface area of 1832.2 m(2) g(-1)) was first employed as a promising formaldehyde gas sensor at a low operating temperature (150 °C), and the gas sensor could detect formaldehyde as low as 5 ppm. This work develops a new promising application approach for porous metal-organic frameworks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ic500474j

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Chen, E.-X., Yang, H., & Zhang, J.
Venue
Inorganic Chemistry
Published
2014-05-12
Volume
53
Issue
11
Pages
5411-5413
ISSN
  • 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-510X
OpenAlex
W2325422946
Cited by
290
References
1
FWCI
11.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.