The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mechanism of Homogeneous CO2 Reduction by Ni(cyclam): Product Selectivity, Concerted Proton–Electron Transfer and C–O Bond Cleavage
Abstract
Homogeneous CO2 reduction catalyzed by [Ni(I)(cyclam)](+) (cyclam = 1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) exhibits high efficiency and selectivity yielding CO only at a relatively low overpotential. In this work, a density functional theory study of the reaction mechanism is presented. Earlier experiments have revealed that the same reaction occurring on mercury surfaces generates a mixture of CO and formate. According to the proposed mechanism, an η(1)-CO2 adduct is the precursor for CO evolution, whereas formate is obtained from an η(1)-OCO adduct. Our calculations show that generation of the η(1)-CO2 adduct is energetically favored by ∼14.0 kcal/mol relative to that of the η(1)-OCO complex, thus rationalizing the product selectivity observed experimentally. Binding of η(1)-CO2 to Ni(I) only leads to partial electron transfer from the metal center to CO2. Hence, further CO2 functionalization likely proceeds via an outer-sphere electron-transfer mechanism, for which concerted proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) is calculated to be the most feasible route. Final C-O bond cleavage involves rather low barriers in the presence of H3O(+) and H2CO3 and is therefore essentially concerted with the preceding PCET. As a result, the entire reaction mechanism can be described as concerted proton-electron transfer and C-O bond cleavage. On the basis of the theoretical results, the limitations of the catalytic activity of Ni(cyclam) are discussed, which sheds light on future design of more efficient catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide
Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X., & Gong, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15008a · Cited by 3,316
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
Frontiers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Biochemical and Chemical Catalysis of CO 2 Fixation
Appel, A. M., Bercaw, J. E., Bocarsly, A. B., Dobbek, H., DuBois, D. L., Dupuis, M., Ferry, J. G., Fujita, E., Hille, R., Kenis, P. J. A., et al. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300463y · Cited by 2,193
Cited by
Electro- and Solar-Driven Fuel Synthesis with First Row Transition Metal Complexes
Dalle, K. E., Warnan, J., Leung, J. J., Reuillard, B., Karmel, I. S., & Reisner, E. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00392 · Cited by 912
Chen, L., Guo, Z., Wei, X.-G., Gallenkamp, C., Bonin, J., Anxolabéhère-Mallart, E., Lau, K.-C., Lau, T.-C., & Robert, M. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b06535 · Cited by 359
Bio-inspired mechanistic insights into CO2 reduction
Mondal, B., Song, J., Neese, F., & Ye, S. (2015) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.12.022 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, J., Klein, E. L., Neese, F., & Ye, S.
- Venue
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-06-24
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7500-7507
- ISSN
- 0020-1669 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-510X
- OpenAlex
- W2320321141
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.