The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomass Pyrolysis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor. Part 2: Experimental Validation of Model Results
Abstract
Various types of cylindrical biomass particles (pine, beech, bamboo, demolition wood) have been pyrolyzed in a batch-wise operated fluid bed laboratory setup. Conversion times, product yields, and product compositions were measured as a function of the particle size (0.7−17 mm), the vapor's residence time (0.25−6 s), the position of the biomass particles in the bed (dense bed or splash zone), and the fluid bed temperature (250−800 °C). For pyrolysis temperatures between 450 and 550 °C, the bio-oil yield appeared to be maximal (in this work: about 65 wt %), while the water content of the bio-oil is minimal. The position of the biomass particles in the fluid bed, either in the dense bed or in the splash zone, does not affect the conversion time and product yields to a large extent during pyrolysis at 500 °C. In the small fluid bed used for this work, with a char hold-up of up to 5 vol % (or 0.7 wt %), the residence time of the pyrolysis vapors is not that critical. At typical fast pyrolysis temperatures of around 500 °C, it appeared sufficient to keep this residence time below 5 s to prevent significant secondary cracking of the produced vapors to noncondensable gas. Up to a diameter of 17 mm, the particle size has only a minor effect on the total liquid yield. However, for particles larger than 3 mm, the water content of the produced bio-oil increases significantly. The experimental results are further compared with predictions from a one-dimensional (1D) and a two-dimensional (2D) single-particle pyrolysis model. Such models appeared to have a limited predictive power due to large uncertainties in the kinetics and selectivity of the biomass decomposition. Moreover, the product quality cannot be predicted at all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kan, T., Strezov, V., & Evans, T. J. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185 · Cited by 2,239
Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis
DIBLASI, C. (2008) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001 · Cited by 1,752
Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis—A Technological Review
Jahirul, M., Rasul, M., Chowdhury, A., & Ashwath, N. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5124952 · Cited by 1,427
Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose
Patwardhan, P. R., Satrio, J. A., Brown, R. C., & Shanks, B. H. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.112 · Cited by 799
Biomass pyrolysis-a review of modelling, process parameters and catalytic studies
Sharma, A., Pareek, V., & Zhang, D. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.193 · Cited by 675
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Kersten, S. R. A., Prins, W., & van Swaaij, W. P. M.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-10-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8786-8795
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2123422491
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass Pyrolysis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor. Part 2: Experimental Validation of Model Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie050486y
- The paper
- Wang, X., Kersten, S. R. A., Prins, W., & van Swaaij, W. P. M. (2005). Biomass Pyrolysis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor. Part 2: Experimental Validation of Model Results. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050486y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.