The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbonation of CaO-Based Sorbents Enhanced by Steam Addition
Abstract
The carbonation reaction has recently been intensively investigated as a means of CO 2 capture from gas mixtures such as flue gas produced during fossil fuel combustion. Unfortunately, this gas−solid reaction is limited due to formation of the solid product (CaCO 3 ) at the reacting surface and sintering, all of which reduce the carrying capacity of the sorbent. In this work the enhancement of carbonation conversion by means of steam addition to the carbonating gas was studied. Seven limestones of different origin and composition as well as one synthetic sorbent (calcium aluminate pellets) were tested. A thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) was employed for the carbonation tests at different temperatures (350−800 °C) in a gas mixture containing typically 20% CO 2 and 10 or 20% H 2 O (g) . The samples tested were calcined under an N 2 (800 °C) or CO 2 (950 °C) atmosphere to explore the influence of different levels of sample sintering, and the results obtained were compared with those seen for carbonation in dry (no steam) gas mixtures. The morphology of samples after carbonation under different conditions was examined by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). It was found that carbonation is enhanced by steam, but this is more pronounced at lower temperatures and for more sintered samples. With increasing temperature and carbonation time, the enhancement of carbonation becomes negligible because the conversion reaches a “maximum” value (∼75−80% for samples calcined in N 2 ) even without steam. Carbonation of samples calcined in CO 2 is enhanced at different levels depending on the sorbent tested. The shape of carbonation profiles and morphology of carbonated samples show that steam enhances solid state diffusion and, consequently, conversion during carbonation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Self-citationCarbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Self-citationUnderstanding the Effect of Water on CO2 Adsorption
Kolle, J. M., Fayaz, M., & Sayari, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00762 · Cited by 523
Performance Enhancement of Calcium Oxide Sorbents for Cyclic CO2 Capture—A Review
Liu, W., An, H., Qin, C., Yin, J., Wang, G., Feng, B., & Xu, M. (2012) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef300220x · Cited by 320
Kinetics studies on wet and dry gas–solid carbonation of MgO and Mg(OH)2 for CO2 sequestration
Fagerlund, J., Highfield, J., & Zevenhoven, R. (2012) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c2ra21428h · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Manovic, V., & Anthony, E. J.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 9105-9110
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2025773893
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbonation of CaO-Based Sorbents Enhanced by Steam Addition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie101352s
- The paper
- Manovic, V., & Anthony, E. J. (2010). Carbonation of CaO-Based Sorbents Enhanced by Steam Addition. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101352s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.