Cited by 146CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMagnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

Kinetics studies on wet and dry gas–solid carbonation of MgO and Mg(OH)2 for CO2 sequestration

Fagerlund, Johan, Highfield, James, Zevenhoven, Ron·2012·RSC Advances

Abstract

Mineral carbonation is a carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) route that warrants further investigation. Although most of the CCS research to date has been concerned with underground storage in liquefied form, mineral carbonation is the only method that disposes CO2 in a permanent and inherently safe manner. Here, we consider the gas–solid conversion of both MgO and Mg(OH)2 with CO2 in the presence and absence of steam in an attempt to model and predict the optimum conditions for rapid and complete carbonation. Results from pressurised thermogravimetric analysers (PTGA) and a laboratory scale pressurised fluidised bed (PFB) are presented. The results show that the carbonation of Mg(OH)2 is much faster (∼50% in 4 min) in a PFB than the carbonation of comparatively fine MgO (<44 μm) in a PTGA (∼50% in 30 min). Furthermore, the results show that the presence of water vapour is pivotal, giving rise to a clear distinction between MgO and Mg(OH)2 carbonation. In the case of MgO, steam (>10%) accelerates the carbonation considerably. However, in the case of Mg(OH)2, the addition of steam to the CO2 is less important as it is provided intrinsically, as a result of the dehydroxylation of Mg(OH)2 at elevated temperatures. Still, humidifying the gas stream can help control dehydroxylation, thereby sustaining carbonation, which typically levels out short of completion. A careful control of the carbonation conditions (temperature, pressure, fluidising velocity, gas composition) and particle properties should allow for close to complete carbonation (>90%) without compromising the carbonation kinetics. Because the PFB carbonation step considered here is part of a larger CCS process (Mg extraction from a natural and abundant mineral followed by production of MgCO3), the precipitation stage [Mg(OH)2 formation] may be tailored to obtain the necessary particle properties (surface area, porosity).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2ra21428h

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extraction and carbonation of Mg(OH)2 is kinetically hindered and may bring high energy penalties for the process.

    “Yet, the extraction and carbonation of Mg(OH) 2 is kinetically hindered and may bring high energy penalties for the process.145”
  • Addition of nucleation seeds induced higher precipitation of magnesite only for activated carbon systems at temperatures ≥150 °C; alumina seeds did not promote remarkable effects on carbonation products.

    “The authors observed that the addition of the nucleation seeds induced higher precipitation of magnesite only for the activated carbon systems at temperatures ≥150 °C.The use of alumina seeds did not promote remarkable effects on the carbonation products (Fig. 17).145”
  • The reaction rates were several orders of magnitude higher in the presence of citrate than in the weakly acidic solution alone.

    “The reactions rates were several orders of magnitude higher in the presence of citrate than in the weakly acidic solution alone.”
  • The recovery and regeneration of the additive salts were not addressed in Krevor and Lackner's work, which represents a major limit for its potential evaluation.

    “The recovery and regeneration of the additive salts were not addressed in this work, which represents a major limit for its potential evaluation, as in the case of strong acids.”
  • In Krevor and Lackner's process, a conversion of 60% was achieved after 2 hours and 80% after 7 hours at 20 bar and 120 1C.

    “After 2 hours a conversion of 60% was achieved, while 80% was reached after 7 hours.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fagerlund, J., Highfield, J., & Zevenhoven, R.
Affiliations
  • Åbo Akademi University (FI)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Fagerlund, Johan
  • Zevenhoven, Ron
Venue
RSC Advances
Published
2012
Volume
2
Issue
27
Pages
10380
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022853213
Cited by
146
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • RSC Advances (publishedVersion)
  • Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
Keywords
CO2 mineralization, CO2 sequestration, carbon capture and storage, carbonation kinetics, steam effect, dehydroxylation, magnesium carbonate, particle size, particle porosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review