The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we present the gasification of microalgae ( Chlorella vulgaris ) and glycerol in supercritical water (SCW) using batch (quartz capillaries) and continuous flow reactors. Preliminary tests of algae gasification were done with quartz capillaries at varying operating conditions such as temperature (400−700 °C), reaction time (1−15 min), and the addition of catalysts. The dry gas composition of uncatalyzed gasification of algae in SCW mainly comprised of CO 2, CO, CH 4, H 2, and some C 2 −C 3 compounds. Higher temperatures, low algae concentrations, and longer residence times favored the algae gasification efficiency (GE). The addition of catalysts to the capillaries resulted in higher yields of hydrogen and lower CO yields via enhanced water−gas shift activity. The addition of catalysts accelerated the gasification efficiency up to a maximum of 84% at 600 °C and 2 min reaction time with nickel-based catalysts. Complete gasification is achieved at higher temperatures (700 °C) and with excess amounts of (Ru/TiO 2 ) catalyst. To elucidate part of the difficulties related to the SCWG of algae, reforming of a model compound (here glycerol) in SCW was carried out in a continuous flow reactor in the presence of additives like amino acids ( l -alanine, glycine, and l -proline) and alkali salt (K 2 CO 3 ) and combinations thereof. The amino acids l -alanine and glycine have a minor effect on the gasification process of glycerol, and a significant reduction of the gasification efficiency was observed in the presence of l -proline. Coke formation and colorization of the reactor effluent were more noticeable with glycerol−amino acid mixtures. In the absence of amino acids, the glycerol solution gasified without any coke formation and colorization of the reactor effluent. Again this effect was more pronounced in the presence of l -proline. The addition of K 2 CO 3 enhanced the glycerol gasification efficiency and increased the hydrogen yields promoting the water−gas shift reaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chisti, Y. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001 · Cited by 9,524
Peterson, A. A., Vogel, F., Lachance, R. P., Fröling, M., Antal, Jr., & Tester, J. W. (2008) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/b810100k · Cited by 2,132
Catalytic conversion of biomass to monofunctional hydrocarbons and targeted liquid-fuel classes
Kunkes, E. L., Simonetti, D. A., West, R. M., Serrano-Ruiz, J. C., Gärtner, C. A., & Dumesic, J. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159210 · Cited by 895
Biomass Gasification in Supercritical Water
Antal, M. J., Allen, S. G., Schulman, D., Xu, X., & Divilio, R. J. (2000) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0003436 · Cited by 610
Bühler, W., Dinjus, E., Ederer, H. J., Kruse, A., & Mas, C. (2002) · The Journal of Supercritical Fluids · doi:10.1016/s0896-8446(01)00105-x · Cited by 489
Hydrothermal Conversion of Biomass: I, Glucose Conversion in Hot Compressed Water
Knežević, D., van Swaaij, W. P. M., & Kersten, S. R. A. (2009) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie801387v · Cited by 180
Self-citation
Cited by
An overview of advances in biomass gasification
Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Clough, P., Yao, J., Zhong, X., Memon, M. Z., Shah, N., Anthony, E. J., & Fennell, P. S. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee00935b · Cited by 1,258
Hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification of Nannochloropsis sp.
Brown, T. M., Duan, P., & Savage, P. E. (2010) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef100203u · Cited by 745
López Barreiro, D., Prins, W., Ronsse, F., & Brilman, W. (2013) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.029 · Cited by 695
Hydrothermal liquefaction of a microalga with heterogeneous catalysts
Duan, P., & Savage, P. E. (2011) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie100758s · Cited by 608
Thermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass into biofuels: A review
Chen, W.-H., Lin, B.-J., Huang, M.-Y., & Chang, J.-S. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.050 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakinala, A. G., Brilman, D. W. F. (., van Swaaij, W. P. M., & Kersten, S. R. A.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-02-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1113-1122
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W1982053506
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie9008293
- The paper
- Chakinala, A. G., Brilman, D. W. F. (., van Swaaij, W. P. M., & Kersten, S. R. A. (2010). Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9008293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.