Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol

Open access
Chakinala, Anand G., Brilman, Derk W. F. (Wim), van Swaaij, Wim P.M., Kersten, Sascha R. A.·2010·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

In this study, we present the gasification of microalgae ( Chlorella vulgaris ) and glycerol in supercritical water (SCW) using batch (quartz capillaries) and continuous flow reactors. Preliminary tests of algae gasification were done with quartz capillaries at varying operating conditions such as temperature (400−700 °C), reaction time (1−15 min), and the addition of catalysts. The dry gas composition of uncatalyzed gasification of algae in SCW mainly comprised of CO 2, CO, CH 4, H 2, and some C 2 −C 3 compounds. Higher temperatures, low algae concentrations, and longer residence times favored the algae gasification efficiency (GE). The addition of catalysts to the capillaries resulted in higher yields of hydrogen and lower CO yields via enhanced water−gas shift activity. The addition of catalysts accelerated the gasification efficiency up to a maximum of 84% at 600 °C and 2 min reaction time with nickel-based catalysts. Complete gasification is achieved at higher temperatures (700 °C) and with excess amounts of (Ru/TiO 2 ) catalyst. To elucidate part of the difficulties related to the SCWG of algae, reforming of a model compound (here glycerol) in SCW was carried out in a continuous flow reactor in the presence of additives like amino acids ( l -alanine, glycine, and l -proline) and alkali salt (K 2 CO 3 ) and combinations thereof. The amino acids l -alanine and glycine have a minor effect on the gasification process of glycerol, and a significant reduction of the gasification efficiency was observed in the presence of l -proline. Coke formation and colorization of the reactor effluent were more noticeable with glycerol−amino acid mixtures. In the absence of amino acids, the glycerol solution gasified without any coke formation and colorization of the reactor effluent. Again this effect was more pronounced in the presence of l -proline. The addition of K 2 CO 3 enhanced the glycerol gasification efficiency and increased the hydrogen yields promoting the water−gas shift reaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie9008293

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Chakinala, A. G., Brilman, D. W. F. (., van Swaaij, W. P. M., & Kersten, S. R. A.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2010-02-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
1113-1122
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W1982053506
Cited by
288
References
6
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie9008293
The paper
Chakinala, A. G., Brilman, D. W. F. (., van Swaaij, W. P. M., & Kersten, S. R. A. (2010). Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9008293

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.