The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon-Catalyzed Gasification of Organic Feedstocks in Supercritical Water
Abstract
Spruce wood charcoal, macadamia shell charcoal, coal activated carbon, and coconut shell activated carbon catalyze the gasification of organic compounds in supercritical water. Feedstocks studied in this paper include glycerol, glucose, cellobiose, whole biomass feedstocks (depithed bagasse liquid extract and sewage sludge), and representative Department of Defense (DoD) wastes (methanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethylene glycol, acetic acid, and phenol). The effects of temperature, pressure, reactant concentration, weight hourly space velocity, and the type of catalyst on the gasification of glucose are reported. Complete conversion of glucose (22% by weight in water) to a hydrogen-rich synthesis gas was realized at a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 22.2 h - 1 in supercritical water at 600 °C, 34.5 MPa. Complete conversions of the whole biomass feeds were also achieved at the same temperature and pressure. The destruction efficiencies for the representative DoD wastes were also high. Deactivation of the carbon catalyst was observed after 4 h of operation without swirl in the entrance region of the reactor, but the carbon gasification efficiency remained near 100% for more than 6 h when a swirl generator was employed in the entrance of the reactor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peterson, A. A., Vogel, F., Lachance, R. P., Fröling, M., Antal, Jr., & Tester, J. W. (2008) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/b810100k · Cited by 2,132
The Art, Science, and Technology of Charcoal Production
Antal, M. J., & Grønli, M. (2003) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0207919 · Cited by 1,623
Self-citationOverview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass
Zhang, L., Xu, C. (., & Champagne, P. (2010) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.038 · Cited by 1,217
A review of hydrothermal biomass processing
Tekin, K., Karagöz, S., & Bektaş, S. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.216 · Cited by 730
Corrosion in high-temperature and supercritical water and aqueous solutions: a review
Kritzer, P. (2004) · The Journal of Supercritical Fluids · doi:10.1016/s0896-8446(03)00031-7 · Cited by 660
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, X., Matsumura, Y., Stenberg, J., & Antal, M. J.
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2522-2530
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2012073963
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon-Catalyzed Gasification of Organic Feedstocks in Supercritical Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ie950672b
- The paper
- Xu, X., Matsumura, Y., Stenberg, J., & Antal, M. J. (1996). Carbon-Catalyzed Gasification of Organic Feedstocks in Supercritical Water. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie950672b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.