Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Parallel (Face-to-Face) Versus Perpendicular (Edge-to-Face) Alignment of Electron Donors and Acceptors in Fullerene Porphyrin Dyads: The Importance of Orientation in Electron Transfer

Guldi, Dirk M., Luo, Chuping, Prato, Maurizio, Troisi, Alessandro, Zerbetto, Francesco, Scheloske, Michael, Dietel, Elke, Bauer, Walter, Hirsch, Andreas·2001·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommunicationNEXTParallel (Face-to-Face) Versus Perpendicular (Edge-to-Face) Alignment of Electron Donors and Acceptors in Fullerene Porphyrin Dyads: The Importance of Orientation in Electron TransferDirk M. Guldi, Chuping Luo, Maurizio Prato, Alessandro Troisi, Francesco Zerbetto, Michael Scheloske, Elke Dietel, Walter Bauer, and Andreas HirschView Author Information Radiation Laboratory, University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche Università di Trieste, Trieste, Italy Dipartimento di Chimica "G. Ciamician" Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy Institut für Organische Chemie Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Henkestrasse 42, 91054 Erlangen, Germany Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 37, 9166–9167Publication Date (Web):August 23, 2001Publication History Received28 November 2000Revised23 March 2001Published online23 August 2001Published inissue 1 September 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja004104lhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ja004104lrapid-communicationACS PublicationsCopyright © 2001 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1239Altmetric-Citations144LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Aromatic compounds,Charge transfer,Hydrocarbons,Pyrroles,Solvents Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja004104l

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Guldi, D. M., Luo, C., Prato, M., Troisi, A., Zerbetto, F., Scheloske, M., Dietel, E., Bauer, W., & Hirsch, A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2001-08-23
Volume
123
Issue
37
Pages
9166-9167
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2160936791
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel (Face-to-Face) Versus Perpendicular (Edge-to-Face) Alignment of Electron Donors and Acceptors in Fullerene Porphyrin Dyads: The Importance of Orientation in Electron Transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja004104l
The paper
Guldi, D. M., Luo, C., Prato, M., Troisi, A., Zerbetto, F., Scheloske, M., Dietel, E., Bauer, W., & Hirsch, A. (2001). Parallel (Face-to-Face) Versus Perpendicular (Edge-to-Face) Alignment of Electron Donors and Acceptors in Fullerene Porphyrin Dyads: The Importance of Orientation in Electron Transfer. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja004104l

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.