Cited by 754Organometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisInorganic and Organometallic ChemistrySynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds

Phosphorus ligand exchange equilibriums on zerovalent nickel. Dominant role for steric effects

Tolman, Chadwick A.·1970·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTPhosphorus ligand exchange equilibriums on zerovalent nickel. Dominant role for steric effectsChadwick A. TolmanCite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 10, 2956–2965Publication Date (Print):May 1, 1970Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 May 1970https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00713a007https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00713a007research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views6526Altmetric-Citations638LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja00713a007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These include relationships between catalysis or ligand binding and the steric bulk of a ligand.

    “These include relationships between catalysis or ligand binding and the steric bulk [e.g., Tolman cone angle (77,78) or buried volume (79)] of a ligand.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolman, C. A.
Corresponding author
Tolman, Chadwick A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
1970-05
Volume
92
Issue
10
Pages
2956-2965
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1973723982
Cited by
754
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Keywords
phosphine ligands, ligand exchange, steric effects, nickel phosphine complexes, exchange equilibria, coordination chemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review