Cited by 176Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysisthermodynamics and calorimetric analyses

Proteochemometric modeling as a tool to design selective compounds and for extrapolating to novel targets

van Westen, Gerard J. P., Wegner, Jörg K., IJzerman, Adriaan P., van Vlijmen, Herman W. T., Bender, A.·2011·MedChemComm

Abstract

Proteochemometric modeling is founded on the principles of QSAR but is able to benefit from additional information in model training due to the inclusion of target information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c0md00165a

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Westen, G. J. P., Wegner, J. K., IJzerman, A. P., van Vlijmen, H. W. T., & Bender, A.
Affiliations
  • Division of Medicinal Chemistry
  • Tibotec BVBA
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Bender, A.
Venue
MedChemComm
Published
2011
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
16-30
ISSN
  • 2040-2503 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-2511
OpenAlex
W1982131304
Cited by
176
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
MedChemComm (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
Keywords
QSAR, target-based drug design, structure-activity relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review