The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Magnetically-Induced Solid-State Electrochemical Detection of DNA Hybridization
Abstract
A magnetic triggering of a solid-state electrical transduction of DNA hybridization is described. Positioning of an external magnet below the thick-film electrode attracts the DNA/particle network and enables the solid-state electrochemical stripping detection of the silver tracer. TEM imaging indicates that the hybridization event results in a three-dimensional aggregate structure in which duplex segments link the metal nanoparticles and magnetic spheres, and that most of this assembly is covered with the silver precipitate. This leads to a direct contact of the metal tag with the surface (in connection to the magnetic collection) and enables the solid-state electrochemical transduction (without prior dissolution and subsequent electrodeposition of the metal), using oxidative dissolution of the silver tracer. No such aggregates (and hence magnetic "collection") are observed in the presence of noncomplementary DNA, that is, without the linking hybrid. The new method couples high sensitivity of silver-amplified assays with effective discrimination against excess of closely related nucleotide sequences (including single-base imperfections). Such direct electrical detection of DNA/metal-particle assemblies can bring new capabilities to the detection of DNA hybridization, and could be applied to other bioaffinity assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gold Nanoparticles in Chemical and Biological Sensing
Saha, K., Agasti, S. S., Kim, C., Li, X., & Rotello, V. M. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2001178 · Cited by 4,620
Drummond, T. G., Hill, M. G., & Barton, J. K. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt873 · Cited by 2,214
Nanomaterials based electrochemical sensors for biomedical applications
Chen, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs35518g · Cited by 956
Electrochemistry of Nucleic Acids
Paleček, E., & Bartošík, M. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200303p · Cited by 668
Electrochemical nucleic acid biosensors
Wang, J. (2002) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(01)01399-x · Cited by 614
Self-citationUltrasensitive DNA Detection Using Highly Fluorescent Bioconjugated Nanoparticles
Zhao, X., Tapec-Dytioco, R., & Tan, W. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0358854 · Cited by 548
Penn, S. G., He, L., & Natan, M. J. (2003) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.08.013 · Cited by 512
Gold nanoparticle-based signal amplification for biosensing
Cao, X., Ye, Y., & Liu, S. (2011) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2011.05.027 · Cited by 393
Biomolecule-nanoparticle hybrids for electrochemical biosensors
GUO, S., & DONG, S. (2009) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2008.10.014 · Cited by 274
Microcantilever resonance-based DNA detection with nanoparticle probes
Su, M., Li, S., & Dravid, V. P. (2003) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1576915 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Xu, D., & Polsky, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-03-28
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4208-4209
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2045636037
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.