The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Kinetic Studies of the Copolymerization of Cyclohexene Oxide and Propylene Oxide with Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Chromium Salen Derivatives. In Situ FTIR Measurements of Copolymer vs Cyclic Carbonate Production
Abstract
The catalysis of the reaction of carbon dioxide with epoxides (cyclohexene oxide or propylene oxide) using the (salen)Cr(III)Cl complex as catalyst, where H(2)salen = N,N'-bis(3,5-di-tert-butylsalicylidene)-1,2-cyclohexenediimine (1), to provide copolymer and cyclic carbonate has been investigated by in situ infrared spectroscopy. As previously demonstrated for the cyclohexene oxide/CO(2) reaction in the presence of complex 1, coupling of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide was found to occur by way of a pathway first-order in catalyst concentration. Unlike the cyclohexene oxide/carbon dioxide reaction catalyzed by complex 1, which affords completely alternating copolymer and only small quantities of trans-cyclic cyclohexyl carbonate, under similar conditions propylene oxide/carbon dioxide produces mostly cyclic propylene carbonate. Comparative kinetic measurements were performed as a function of reaction temperature to assess the activation barrier for production of cyclic carbonates and polycarbonates for the two different classes of epoxides, i.e., alicyclic (cyclohexene oxide) and aliphatic (propylene oxide). As anticipated in both instances the unimolecular pathway for cyclic carbonate formation has a larger energy of activation than the bimolecular enchainment pathway. That is, the energies of activation determined for cyclic propylene carbonate and poly(propylene carbonate) formation were 100.5 and 67.6 kJ.mol(-1), respectively, compared to the corresponding values for cyclic cyclohexyl carbonate and poly(cyclohexylene carbonate) production of 133 and 46.9 kJ.mol(-1). The small energy difference in the two concurrent reactions for the propylene oxide/CO(2) process (33 kJ.mol(-1)) accounts for the large quantity of cyclic carbonate produced at elevated temperatures in this instance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asymmetric Catalysis of Epoxide Ring-Opening Reactions
Jacobsen, E. N. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar960061v · Cited by 1,261
Cited by
Darensbourg, D. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068363q · Cited by 1,593
Self-citationCoates, G. W., & Moore, D. R. (2004) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200460442 · Cited by 1,154
Recent Advances in the Catalytic Preparation of Cyclic Organic Carbonates
Martín, C., Fiorani, G., & Kleij, A. W. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs5018997 · Cited by 1,037
Recent advances in CO2/epoxide copolymerization—New strategies and cooperative mechanisms
Klaus, S., Lehenmeier, M. W., Anderson, C. E., & Rieger, B. (2011) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.002 · Cited by 710
Baleizão, C., & Garcia, H. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050973n · Cited by 697
Metadata
- Authors
- Darensbourg, D. J., Yarbrough, J. C., Ortiz, C., & Fang, C. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 7586-7591
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1971442766
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Kinetic Studies of the Copolymerization of Cyclohexene Oxide and Propylene Oxide with Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Chromium Salen Derivatives. In Situ FTIR Measurements of Copolymer vs Cyclic Carbonate Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja034863e
- The paper
- Darensbourg, D. J., Yarbrough, J. C., Ortiz, C., & Fang, C. C. (2003). Comparative Kinetic Studies of the Copolymerization of Cyclohexene Oxide and Propylene Oxide with Carbon Dioxide in the Presence of Chromium Salen Derivatives. In Situ FTIR Measurements of Copolymer vs Cyclic Carbonate Production. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja034863e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.