The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved Treatment of the Protein Backbone in Empirical Force Fields
Abstract
Empirical force field-based calculations of proteins, including protein-folding studies, have improved our understanding of the relationship of their structure to their biological function. However, limitations in the accuracy of empirical force fields in the treatment of the peptide backbone exist. Presented is a grid correction approach to improve the treatment of the peptide backbone phi/psi conformational energies. Inclusion of this correction with the CHARMM22 all-atom protein force field is shown to lead to significant improvement in the treatment of the conformational energies of both the peptide model compound, the alanine dipeptide, and of proteins in their crystal environment. The developed approach is suggested to lead to significant improvements in the accuracy of empirical force fields to treat peptides and proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CHARMM‐GUI: A web‐based graphical user interface for CHARMM
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G., & Im, W. (2008) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20945 · Cited by 9,284
Entropic Stabilization of Proteins by TMAO
Cho, S. S., Reddy, G., Straub, J. E., & Thirumalai, D. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp207289b · Cited by 198
Modeling the structure of the StART domains of MLN64 and StAR proteins in complex with cholesterol
Murcia, M., Faráldo-Gómez, J. D., Maxfield, F. R., & Roux, B. (2006) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m600232-jlr200 · Cited by 111
Biomolecular simulation and modelling: status, progress and prospects
van der Kamp, M. W., Shaw, K. E., Woods, C. J., & Mulholland, A. J. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0105.focus · Cited by 90
Structural Features of the αβTCR Mechanotransduction Apparatus That Promote pMHC Discrimination
Brazin, K. N., Mallis, R. J., Das, D. K., Feng, Y., Hwang, W., Wang, J.-H., Wagner, G., Lang, M. J., & Reinherz, E. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00441 · Cited by 70
Differential dynamics of RAS isoforms in GDP- and GTP-bound states
Kapoor, A., & Travesset, A. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24805 · Cited by 53
Gebregiworgis, T., Kano, Y., St-Germain, J., Radulovich, N., Udaskin, M. L., Mentes, A., Huang, R., Poon, B. P. K., He, W., Valencia-Sama, I., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26526-y · Cited by 49
Hierarchical Folding Free Energy Landscape of HP35 Revealed by Most Probable Path Clustering
Jain, A., & Stock, G. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp410398a · Cited by 48
Gómez, H., Rojas, R., Patel, D., Tabak, L. A., Lluch, J. M., & Masgrau, L. (2014) · Org. Biomol. Chem. · doi:10.1039/c3ob42569j · Cited by 41
Atomic resolution ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins with Alphafold
Schnapka, V., Morozova, T. I., Sen, S., & Bonomi, M. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69172-y · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- MacKerell, A. D., Feig, M., & Brooks, C. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-12-30
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 698-699
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1974030600
- Cited by
- 984
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
