Cited by 26Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistrySupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesMagnetism in coordination complexes

Molecular Logic: A Half-Subtractor Based on Tetraphenylporphyrin [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11198−11199].

Langford, Steven J., Yann, Trevor·2003·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVAddition/CorrectionNEXTORIGINAL ARTICLEThis notice is a correctionMolecular Logic: A Half-Subtractor Based on Tetraphenylporphyrin [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11198−11199]. Steven J. Langford and Trevor YannCite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 48, 14951Publication Date (Web):October 25, 2003Publication History Published online25 October 2003Published inissue 1 December 2003https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja038843ohttps://doi.org/10.1021/ja038843ocorrectionACS PublicationsCopyright © 2003 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views501Altmetric-Citations26LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (34 KB) Get e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja038843o

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with the traditional half-subtractor, no parallel logic gates are needed in this system to respond synchronously to achieve binary subtraction calculation.

    “Compared with the traditional half-subtractor [44,45], no parallel logic gates are needed in this system to respond synchronously to achieve the effect of binary subtraction calculation.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langford, S. J., & Yann, T.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2003-10-25
Volume
125
Issue
48
Pages
14951-14951
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2018822564
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Magnetism in coordination complexes
Keywords
molecular logic, half subtractor, tetraphenylporphyrin, porphyrins, logic gates, molecular electronics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review