Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Representing Receptor Flexibility in Ligand Docking through Relevant Normal Modes

Cavasotto, Claudio N., Kovacs, Julio A., Abagyan, Ruben A.·2005·Journal of the American Chemical Society
DOI 10.1021/ja042260c
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Inspired by the current representation of the ligand-receptor binding process, a normal-mode-based methodology is presented to incorporate receptor flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening. However, the systematic representation of the deformation space grows geometrically with the number of modes, and furthermore, midscale loop rearrangements like those found in protein kinase binding pockets cannot be accounted for with the first lowest-frequency modes. We thus introduced a measure of relevance of normal modes on a given region of interest and showed that only very few modes in the low-frequency range are necessary and sufficient to describe loop flexibility in cAMP-dependent protein kinase. We used this approach to generate an ensemble of representative receptor backbone conformations by perturbing the structure along a combination of relevant modes. Each ensemble conformation is complexed with known non-native binders to optimize the position of the binding-pocket side chains through a full flexible docking procedure. The multiple receptor conformations thus obtained are used in a small-scale virtual screening using receptor ensemble docking. We evaluated this algorithm on holo and apo structures of cAMP-dependent protein kinase that exhibit backbone rearrangements on two independent loop regions close to the binding pocket. Docking accuracy is improved, since the ligands considered in the virtual screening docked within 1.5 A to at least one of the structures. The discrimination between binders and nonbinders is also enhanced, as shown by the improvement of the enrichment factor. This constitutes a new step toward the systematic integration of flexible ligand-flexible receptor docking tools in structure-based drug discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja042260c

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cavasotto, C. N., Kovacs, J. A., & Abagyan, R. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-06-14
Volume
127
Issue
26
Pages
9632-9640
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
DOI
10.1021/ja042260c
OpenAlex
W1969875513
Cited by
278
References
32
FWCI
21.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.