The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charge Shift and Triplet State Formation in the 9-Mesityl-10-methylacridinium Cation
Abstract
The target donor-acceptor compound forms an acridinium-like, locally excited (LE) singlet state on illumination with blue or near-UV light. This LE state undergoes rapid charge transfer from the acridinium ion to the orthogonally sited mesityl group in polar solution. The resultant charge-transfer (CT) state fluoresces in modest yield and decays on the nanosecond time scale. The LE and CT states reside in thermal equilibrium at ambient temperature; decay of both states is weakly activated in fluid solution, but decay of the CT state is activationless in a glassy matrix. Analysis of the fluorescence spectrum allows precise location of the relevant energy levels. Intersystem crossing competes with radiative and nonradiative decay of the CT state such that an acridinium-like, locally excited triplet state is formed in both fluid solution and a glassy matrix. Phosphorescence spectra position the triplet energy well below that of the CT state. The triplet decays via first-order kinetics with a lifetime of ca. 30 micros at room temperature in the absence of oxygen but survives for ca. 5 ms in an ethanol glass at 77 K. The quantum yield for formation of the LE triplet state is 0.38 but increases by a factor of 2.3-fold in the presence of iodomethane. The triplet reacts with molecular oxygen to produce singlet molecular oxygen in high quantum yield. In sharp contradiction to a recent literature report, there is no spectroscopic evidence to indicate the presence of an unusually long-lived CT state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The energy gap law for radiationless transitions in large molecules
Englman, R., & Jortner, J. (1970) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268977000100171 · Cited by 2,778
Cited by
Development of bioinspired artificial photosynthetic systems
Fukuzumi, S. (2008) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b801198m · Cited by 447
Long-Lived Charge Separation and Applications in Artificial Photosynthesis
Fukuzumi, S., Ohkubo, K., & Suenobu, T. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400200u · Cited by 411
Kwon, K., Simons, R. T., Nandakumar, M., & Roizen, J. L. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00444 · Cited by 389
Skin protection against UV light by dietary antioxidants
Fernández-García, E. (2014) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c4fo00280f · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Benniston, A. C., Harriman, A., Li, P., Rostron, J. P., van Ramesdonk, H. J., Groeneveld, M. M., Zhang, H., & Verhoeven, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 16054-16064
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1964464265
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.