The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Tandem Orthogonal Proteolysis Strategy for High-Content Chemical Proteomics
Abstract
The field of proteomics aims to assign functions to the numerous protein products encoded by eukaryotic and prokaryotic genomes. Toward this end, chemical strategies have emerged as a powerful means to enrich specific classes of proteins based on shared functional properties, such as catalytic activity [activity-based protein profiling (ABPP)], and post-translational modification state. The theoretical information content in chemical proteomic experiments greatly exceeds the actual data procured, due in large part to limitations in existing analytical technologies. Here, we present a tandem orthogonal proteolysis (TOP) strategy for high-content chemical proteomics that enables the parallel characterization of probe-labeled proteins and sites of probe modification. The TOP approach exploits "click chemistry" to introduce a multifunctional tag onto probe-labeled proteins that contains both a biotin group for protein enrichment and a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site for selective release of probe-modified peptides. Following capture on streptavidin beads, protein targets of probes and their sites of labeling are sequentially identified by a two-step proteolysis strategy (trypsin and TEV, respectively). We apply the TOP method to characterize targets of sulfonate ester ABPP probes in tissue proteomes, resulting in the discovery of numerous active site-labeled enzymes. Enzymes modified on regulatory sites and proteins of unknown function were also identified. These findings indicate that a wide range of functional residues are targeted by sulfonate ester probes and highlight the value of TOP-based chemical proteomics for the characterization of proteins and the residues that regulate their activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Cited by
Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes
Weerapana, E., Wang, C., Simon, G. M., Richter, F., Khare, S., Dillon, M. B. D., Bachovchin, D. A., Mowen, K., Baker, D., & Cravatt, B. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09472 · Cited by 1,684
Self-citationActivity-Based Protein Profiling: From Enzyme Chemistry to Proteomic Chemistry
Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T., & Kozarich, J. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125 · Cited by 1,270
Self-citationRedox-based reagents for chemoselective methionine bioconjugation
Lin, S., Yang, X., Jia, S., Weeks, A. M., Hornsby, M., Lee, P. S., Nichiporuk, R. V., Iavarone, A. T., Wells, J. A., Toste, F. D., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal3316 · Cited by 513
Target Identification for Small Bioactive Molecules: Finding the Needle in the Haystack
Ziegler, S., Pries, V., Hedberg, C., & Waldmann, H. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201208749 · Cited by 466
Weerapana, E., Speers, A. E., & Cravatt, B. F. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.194 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Speers, A. E., & Cravatt, B. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-06-25
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 10018-10019
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2079328545
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.