The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tailoring of Nanoscale Porosity in Carbide-Derived Carbons for Hydrogen Storage
Abstract
The poor performance of hydrogen storage materials continues to hinder development of fuel cell-powered automobiles. Nanoscale carbons, in particular (activated carbon, exfoliated graphite, fullerenes, nanotubes, nanofibers, and nanohorns), have not fulfilled their initial promise. Here we show that carbon materials can be rationally designed for H2 storage. Carbide-derived carbons (CDC), a largely unknown class of porous carbons, are produced by high-temperature chlorination of carbides. Metals and metalloids are removed as chlorides, leaving behind a collapsed noncrystalline carbon with up to 80% open pore volume. The detailed nature of the porosity-average size and size distribution, shape, and total specific surface area (SSA)-can be tuned with high sensitivity by selection of precursor carbide (composition, lattice type) and chlorination temperature. The optimum temperature is bounded from below by thermodynamics and kinetics of chlorination reactions and from above by graphitization, which decreases SSA and introduces H2-sorbing surfaces with binding energies too low to be useful. Intuitively, pores of different size and shape should not contribute equally to hydrogen storage. By correlating pore properties with 77 K H2 isotherms from a wide variety of CDCs, we experimentally confirm that gravimetric hydrogen storage capacity normalized to total pore volume is optimized in materials with primarily micropores ( approximately 1 nm) rather than mesopores. Thus, in agreement with theoretical predictions, a narrow size distribution of small pores is desirable for storing hydrogen, while large pores merely degrade the volumetric storage capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Materials for hydrogen storage
Züttel, A. (2003) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(03)00922-2 · Cited by 2,216
Cited by
Carbon materials for chemical capacitive energy storage
Zhai, Y., Dou, Y., Zhao, D., Fulvio, P. F., Mayes, R. T., & Dai, S. (2011) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201100984 · Cited by 2,964
Yu, X., Tang, Z., Sun, D., Ouyang, L., & Zhu, M. (2017) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.03.001 · Cited by 716
Carbide‐Derived Carbons – From Porous Networks to Nanotubes and Graphene
Presser, V., Heon, M., & Gogotsi, Y. (2011) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201002094 · Cited by 678
Self-citationEffect of pore size on carbon dioxide sorption by carbide derived carbon
Presser, V., McDonough, J., Yeon, S.-H., & Gogotsi, Y. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01176f · Cited by 668
Self-citationHydrogen storage: the remaining scientific and technological challenges
Felderhoff, M., Weidenthaler, C., von Helmolt, R., & Eberle, U. (2007) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b701563c · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Gogotsi, Y., Dash, R. K., Yushin, G., Yildirim, T., Laudisio, G., & Fischer, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-10-27
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 16006-16007
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1983353258
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.