The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Size-Sorted Anionic Iron Oxide Nanomagnets as Colloidal Mediators for Magnetic Hyperthermia
Abstract
Iron oxide colloidal nanomagnets generate heat when subjected to an alternating magnetic field. Their heating power, governed by the mechanisms of magnetic energy dissipation for single-domain particles (Brown and Néel relaxations), is highly sensitive to the crystal size, the material, and the solvent properties. This study was designed to distinguish between the contributions of Néel and Brownian mechanisms to heat generation. Anionic nanocrystals of maghemite and cobalt ferrite, differing by their magnetic anisotropy, were chemically synthesized and dispersed in an aqueous suspension by electrostatic stabilization. The particles were size-sorted by successive electrostatic phase separation steps. Parameters governing the efficiency of nanomagnets as heat mediators were varied independently; these comprised the particle size (from 5 to 16.5 nm), the solvent viscosity, magnetic anisotropy, and the magnetic field frequency and amplitude. The measured specific loss powers (SLPs) were in quantitative agreement with the results of a predictive model taking into account both Néel and Brown loss processes and the whole particle size distribution. By varying the carrier fluid viscosity, we found that Brownian friction within the carrier fluid was the main contributor to the heating power of cobalt ferrite particles. In contrast, Néel internal rotation of the magnetic moment accounted for most of the loss power of maghemite particles. Specific loss powers were varied by 3 orders of magnitude with increasing maghemite crystal size (from 4 to 1650 W/g at 700 kHz and 24.8 kA/m). This comprehensive parametric study provides the groundwork for the use of anionic colloidal nanocrystals to generate magnetically induced hyperthermia in various media, including complex systems and biological materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Controlled drug delivery vehicles for cancer treatment and their performance
Senapati, S., Mahanta, A. K., Kumar, S., & Maiti, P. (2018) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-017-0004-3 · Cited by 2,167
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles
Ali, A., Zafar, H., Zia, M., ul Haq, I., Phull, A. R., Ali, J. S., & Hussain, A. (2016) · Nanotechnology, Science and Applications · doi:10.2147/nsa.s99986 · Cited by 1,591
Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine
Pankhurst, Q. A., Thanh, N. T. K., Jones, S. K., & Dobson, J. (2009) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001 · Cited by 1,455
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Metadata
- Authors
- Fortin, J.-P., Wilhelm, C., Servais, J., Ménager, C., Bacri, J.-C., & Gazeau, F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2628-2635
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2112794532
- Cited by
- 1,038
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size-Sorted Anionic Iron Oxide Nanomagnets as Colloidal Mediators for Magnetic Hyperthermia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja067457e
- The paper
- Fortin, J.-P., Wilhelm, C., Servais, J., Ménager, C., Bacri, J.-C., & Gazeau, F. (2007). Size-Sorted Anionic Iron Oxide Nanomagnets as Colloidal Mediators for Magnetic Hyperthermia. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja067457e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.