The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Inconsistency in Adsorption Properties and Powder XRD Data of MOF-5 Is Rationalized by Framework Interpenetration and the Presence of Organic and Inorganic Species in the Nanocavities
Abstract
MOF-5 is the archetype metal-organic framework and has been subjected to numerous studies the past few years. The focal point of this report is the pitfalls related to the MOF-5 phase identification based on powder XRD data. A broad set of conditions and procedures have been reported for MOF-5 synthesis. These variations have led to materials with substantially different adsorption properties (specific surface areas in the range 700 to 3400 m(2)/g). The relatively low weight loss observed for some as synthesized samples upon solvent removal is also indicative of a low pore volume. Regrettably, these materials have all been described as MOF-5 without any further comments. Furthermore, the reported powder XRD patterns hint at structural differences: The variations in surface area are accompanied by peak splitting phenomena and rather pronounced changes in the relative peak intensities in the powder XRD patterns. In this work, we use single-crystal XRD to investigate structural differences between low and high surface area MOF-5. The low surface area MOF-5 sample had two different classes of crystals. For the dominant phase, Zn(OH)2 species partly occupied the cavities. The presence of Zn species makes the hosting cavity and possibly also adjacent cavities inaccessible and thus efficiently reduces the pore volume of the material. Furthermore, the minor phase consisted of doubly interpenetrated MOF-5 networks, which lowers the adsorption capacity. The presence of Zn species and lattice interpenetration changes the symmetry from cubic to trigonal and explains the peak splitting observed in the powder XRD patterns. Pore-filling effects from the Zn species (and partly the solvent molecules) are also responsible for the pronounced variations in powder XRD peak intensities. This latter conclusion is particularly useful for predicting the adsorption properties of a MOF-5-type material from powder XRD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Valenzano, L., Civalleri, B., Chavan, S., Bordiga, S., Nilsen, M. H., Jakobsen, S., Lillerud, K. P., & Lamberti, C. (2011) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm1022882 · Cited by 1,919
Self-citationThin films of metal–organic frameworks
Zacher, D., Shekhah, O., Wöll, C., & Fischer, R. A. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b805038b · Cited by 893
Structure-Directing Role of Graphene in the Synthesis of Metal−Organic Framework Nanowire
Jahan, M., Bao, Q., Yang, J.-X., & Loh, K. P. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja105089w · Cited by 466
Li, D., Yadav, A., Zhou, H., Roy, K., Thanasekaran, P., & Lee, C. (2024) · Global Challenges · doi:10.1002/gch2.202300244 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Hafizovic, J., Bjørgen, M., Olsbye, U., Dietzel, P. D. C., Bordiga, S., Prestipino, C., Lamberti, C., & Lillerud, K. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3612-3620
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2083829892
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Inconsistency in Adsorption Properties and Powder XRD Data of MOF-5 Is Rationalized by Framework Interpenetration and the Presence of Organic and Inorganic Species in the Nanocavities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0675447
- The paper
- Hafizovic, J., Bjørgen, M., Olsbye, U., Dietzel, P. D. C., Bordiga, S., Prestipino, C., Lamberti, C., & Lillerud, K. P. (2007). The Inconsistency in Adsorption Properties and Powder XRD Data of MOF-5 Is Rationalized by Framework Interpenetration and the Presence of Organic and Inorganic Species in the Nanocavities. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0675447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.