The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinetics of Amyloid β Monomer-to-Oligomer Exchange by NMR Relaxation
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies have implicated non-fibrillar oligomers of the amyloid beta (Abeta) peptide as the primary toxic species in Alzheimer's disease. Detailed structural and kinetic characterization of these states, however, has been difficult. Here we use NMR relaxation measurements to address the kinetics of exchange between monomeric and large, polymorphic oligomeric species of Abeta(1-40). (15)N and (1)H(N) R(2) data at multiple magnetic fields were recorded for several peptide concentrations subsequent to the establishment of a stable pseudo-equilibrium between monomeric and NMR-invisible soluble oligomeric species. The increase in (15)N and (1)H(N) R(2) rates as a function of protein concentration is independent of nucleus and magnetic field and shows only a small degree of variation along the peptide chain. This phenomenon is due to a lifetime broadening effect arising from the unidirectional conversion of monomer to the NMR-invisible oligomeric species ("dark" state). At a total Abeta(1-40) concentration of 300 microM, the apparent first-order rate constant for this process is approximately 3 s(-1). Fitting the McConnell equations for two dipolar-coupled spins in two-site exchange to transfer-of-saturation profiles at two radiofrequency field strengths gives an estimate for k(off) of 73 s(-1) and transiently bound monomer (1)H(N) R(2) rates of up to 42,000 s(-1) in the tightly bound central hydrophobic region and approximately 300 s(-1) in the disordered regions, such as the first nine residues. The fraction of peptide within the "dark" oligomeric state undergoing exchange with free monomer is calculated to be approximately 3%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Querfurth, H. W., & LaFerla, F. M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0909142 · Cited by 4,569
Aβ Oligomers – a decade of discovery
Walsh, D. M., & Selkoe, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04426.x · Cited by 1,938
Self-Propagating, Molecular-Level Polymorphism in Alzheimer's ß-Amyloid Fibrils
Petkova, A. T., Leapman, R. D., Guo, Z., Yau, W.-M., Mattson, M. P., & Tycko, R. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1105850 · Cited by 1,687
Visualization of transient encounter complexes in protein–protein association
Tang, C., Iwahara, J., & Clore, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05201 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Cited by
Molecular interactions underlying liquid‐liquid phase separation of the FUS low‐complexity domain
Murthy, A. C., Dignon, G. L., Kan, Y., Zerze, G. H., Parekh, S. H., Mittal, J., & Fawzi, N. L. (2019) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-019-0250-x · Cited by 698
Self-citationMonahan, Z., Ryan, V. H., Janke, A. M., Burke, K. A., Rhoads, S. N., Zerze, G. H., O'Meally, R., Dignon, G. L., Conicella, A. E., Zheng, W., et al. (2017) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201696394 · Cited by 684
Self-citationAtomic-resolution dynamics on the surface of amyloid-β protofibrils probed by solution NMR
Fawzi, N. L., Ying, J., Ghirlando, R., Torchia, D. A., & Clore, G. M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10577 · Cited by 419
Self-citationZhang, X., Tian, Y., Li, Z., Tian, X., Sun, H., Liu, H., Moore, A., & Ran, C. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja405239v · Cited by 354
Eftekharzadeh, B., Banduseela, V. C., Chiesa, G., Martínez-Cristóbal, P., Rauch, J. N., Nath, S. R., Schwarz, D. M. C., Shao, H., Marin-Argany, M., Di Sanza, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11594-y · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Fawzi, N. L., Ying, J., Torchia, D. A., & Clore, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-07-06
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 9948-9951
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2039735363
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.