The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancement of the Catalytic Activity of Supported Gold Nanoparticles for the Fenton Reaction by Light
Open accessAbstract
Laser flash photolysis of supported gold nanoparticles exciting at the surface plasmon band (532 nm) has allowed in the case of Au/CeO(2) and Au/OH-npD (OH-npD: Fenton-treated diamond nanoparticles) detection of transients decaying in the microsecond time scale that have been attributed as indicating photoinduced electron ejection from gold based on N(2)O quenching and the observation of the generation of methyl viologen radical cations. This photochemical behavior has led us to hypothesize that there could be assistance to the catalytic activity of these materials by irradiation in those cases wherein the mechanism involves electron transfer to or from a substrate to the gold. This hypothesis has been confirmed by observing that the catalytic activity of Au/OH-npD for the Fenton degradation of phenol with hydrogen peroxide can be increased over 1 order of magnitude by irradiation at 532 nm. Moreover, there is a linear relationship between the initial reaction rate and the incident photon flux. This photoenhancement allows promoting Fenton activity at pH 8 in which the catalytic activity of Au/OH-npD is negligible. The same photo enhancement activity for the Fenton degradation of phenol was observed for other supported gold catalysts including those that do not exhibit microsecond transients in the nanosecond laser flash photolysis (Au/TiO(2) and Au/SiO(2)) due to their lifetime shorter than microseconds. It is proposed that the photo enhancement should be a general phenomenon in gold catalysis for those reaction mechanisms involving positive and/or negative gold species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Supported gold nanoparticles as catalysts for organic reactions
Corma, A., & Garcia, H. (2008) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b707314n · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy
Linic, S., Christopher, P., & Ingram, D. B. (2011) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3151 · Cited by 4,852
Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy
Zhou, Z., Song, J., Nie, L., & Chen, X. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00271d · Cited by 2,098
Li, H., Shang, J., Yang, Z., Shen, W., Ai, Z., & Zhang, L. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00040 · Cited by 538
Yang, J., Guo, Y., Jiang, R., Qin, F., Zhang, H., Lu, W., Wang, J., & Yu, J. C. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03537 · Cited by 499
A Novel Application of Plasmonics: Plasmon‐Driven Surface‐Catalyzed Reactions
Sun, M., & Xu, H. (2012) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201200572 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Navalon, S., de Miguel, M., Martin, R., Alvaro, M., & Garcia, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-01-31
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2218-2226
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2314438598
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.