The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intercalation of Few-Layer Graphite Flakes with FeCl3: Raman Determination of Fermi Level, Layer by Layer Decoupling, and Stability
Open accessAbstract
We use anhydrous ferric chloride (FeCl(3)) to intercalate graphite flakes consisting of 2-4 graphene layers and to dope graphene monolayers. The intercalant, staging, stability, and doping of the resulting intercalation compounds (ICs) are characterized by Raman scattering. The G peak of heavily doped monolayer graphene upshifts to ∼1627 cm(-1). The 2-4 layer ICs have similar upshifts, and a Lorentzian line shape for the 2D band, indicating that each layer behaves as a decoupled heavily doped monolayer. By performing Raman measurements at different excitation energies, we show that, for a given doping level, the 2D peak can be suppressed by Pauli blocking for laser energy below the doping level. Thus, multiwavelength Raman spectroscopy allows a direct measurement of the Fermi level, complementary to that derived by performing measurements at fixed excitation energy significantly higher than the doping level. This allows us to estimate a Fermi level shift of up to ∼0.9 eV. These ICs are thus ideal test-beds for the physical and chemical properties of heavily doped graphenes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-dimensional atomic crystals
Novoselov, K. S., Jiang, D., Schedin, F., Booth, T. J., Khotkevich, V. V., Morozov, S. V., & Geim, A. K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0502848102 · Cited by 11,788
Cited by
Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene
Ferrari, A. C., & Basko, D. M. (2013) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.46 · Cited by 7,405
Self-citationRaman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices
Wu, J.-B., Lin, M.-L., Cong, X., Liu, H.-N., & Tan, P.-H. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00915h · Cited by 2,092
Self-citationGrapheneviasonication assisted liquid-phase exfoliation
Ciesielski, A., & Samorì, P. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60217f · Cited by 1,207
Salt melt synthesis of ceramics, semiconductors and carbon nanostructures
Liu, X., Fechler, N., & Antonietti, M. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60159e · Cited by 688
Doping Dependence of the Raman Spectrum of Defected Graphene
Bruna, M., Ott, A. K., Ijäs, M., Yoon, D., Sassi, U., & Ferrari, A. C. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn502676g · Cited by 391
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, W., Tan, P. H., Liu, J., & Ferrari, A. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-24
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5941-5946
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2073171182
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.